Built with dart_codemod.
Codemods to help consumers of over_react automate the migration of UI component code.
Note: this package requires Dart SDK version 2.1.0 to run, but the codemods themselves are designed to run on code that is written for Dart 1.x or 2.x.
dart pub global activate over_react_codemod
Once you've activated this package, you should be able to run whichever codemods you need via pub global run.
This package provides a intl_message_migration codemod that will modify existing UI component code to make them available for internationalization.
For more information, please see the INTL Message Codemod Readme
The dart2_upgrade codemod that used to be provided by this package is no longer available.
To use it, you'll need over_react_codemod 1.1.0 instead of the latest, which also must be used with Dart 2.1.0:
asdf install dart 2.1.0 asdf shell dart 2.1.0 pub global activate over_react_codemod 1.1.0
Once that's set up, see the dart2_upgrade documentation here: https://github.com/Workiva/over_react_codemod/tree/1.1.0#dart-1-to-dart-2-codemod
Especially in the case where a forwards- and backwards-compatible version of your code is necessary, it can be helpful to be able to check automatically for regressions after having initially migrated your code. Doing so will help prevent accidentally merging code that doesn't meet your compatability expectations.
Each of these codemods can be run in a --fail-on-changes mode that will count the number of changes that would have been suggested and exit with a non-zero exit code if that number is greater than 0.
As an example, adding the following command to your CI process or pre-merge checklist will prevent merging code that is not in the form that is compatible with both Dart 1 and Dart 2:
dart pub global run over_react_codemod:dart2_upgrade --fail-on-changesIgnoring Codemod Suggestions
Some of the changes provided by the codemods in this package are based on imperfect heuristics (e.g. looking for a specific naming convention) and consequently may be susceptible to false positives. If you hit such a case in your codebase, you can tell the codemod to ignore a certain line by attaching an ignore comment either on the same line or the immediately preceding line.
For example, consider a mixin usage that happens to match the naming convention of ending with StateMixin, but isn't actually an over_react state mixin:
class Foo extends Object with BarStateMixin {}
As is, the dart2_upgrade --backwards-compat codemod would find this code and attempt to change it to:
class Foo extends Object
with
BarStateMixin,
// ignore: mixin_of_non_class, undefined_class
$BarStateMixin {}
But if BarStateMixin isn't actually an over_react state mixin, then this updated code will fail. To avoid this problem, simply add an // orcm_ignore comment to the mixin type that should be ignored:
class Foo extends Object
with
// orcm_ignore
BarStateMixin {}
This ignore mechanism works with any of the changes that the codemods in this package will try to suggest.
AstNode and Element subclasses are well-documented, and are very helpful in describing the relationships between different types of nodes/elements and pointing to other classes. Reading those and clicking through the references is a good way to learn about specific structures, and help get your bearings.Code defensively for edge-cases, and avoid assumptions about the AST or Element model.
Some codemods process a lot of code, especially when identifying code that should be operated on, and some of that code may have structures you don't expect.
That doesn't necessarily mean your codemod should handle every single edge-case, but generally it shouldn't break with uncaught exceptions when it encounters certain code.
Things to avoid assumptions about:
tryCast() and ancestorOfType() can be handy in certain cases.!.first/.last/.single on iterables, either check the length of the iterable first, or switch to something more conditional like .firstWhere() or .firstOrNullAvoid using childEntities
Most AST node classes have getters for their different child nodes. Using these helps make code easier to read, and also provide typing (and nullability) which helps with static analysis and autocomplete.
If you're manually traversing the AST trying to find a certain descendant, consider whether a visitor-based implementation would be better.
Avoid using AstNode.toSource() (or .toString()) outside of tests
To identify relevant code. There may be different syntax variations (either current or in future Dart versions) of code that unintentionally wouldn't be a match.
For example, if we were doing expression.toSource() == 'foo.bar()', we would miss the following cases:
foo..bar(); foo?.bar(); namespaced_import.foo.bar(); foo.bar(optionalArgAddedInSubclass: true);
Instead, we could check for the method name via:
expression is MethodInvocation && expression.methodName.name == 'bar'
and change the foo check to something else, depending on the use-case:
// Check whether the target is a "foo" identifier // (though this doesn't handle prefixed cases) expression.realTarget?.tryCast<Identifier>()?.name == 'foo' // Check whether it statically points to a `foo` variable expression.realTarget?.tryCast<Identifier>()?.staticElement?.name == 'foo'); // Or, Check whether it's a `Foo` object: isFooType(expression.realTarget?.staticType); // (Or, something else)
For cases where the syntax seems simple enough where variations shouldn't be a problem, there are usually APIs that provide the value you're looking for.
final identifier = parseIdentifier('foo');
identifier.name; // 'foo'
final boolean = parseBooleanLiteral('false');
boolean.value; // false
final import = parseImportDirective('import "package:foo/foo.dart";');
import.uriContent; // 'package:foo/foo.dart'For building patch strings (such as when moving code from one place to another).
toSource() provides an approximation of the source, and may be missing comments or have different whitespace. If needed, use the context.sourceFile to get the original source for a given node.
Don't make assumptions about existing whitespace and line breaks.
There are different ways code can be formatted with dartfmt, and some code may not be formatted at all, so it's unsafe to make assumptions.
For instance, if you'd like to yield a patch that deletes a newline with some code, either check for its existence first by getting the source or line number of that offset in context.sourceFile. Or, instead of deleting from node.offset, delete from the end of the previous token (node.prevToken?.end ?? node.offset) to take any whitespace between those nodes with it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4