Tools should not be named after style guide PEPs. A style guide is a document written for humans, and has lots of subtlety. Issues caused by the rigidity or simplicity of the tool end up causing pointless discussion about the letter of the PEP, as if it was a law, which was never the intention of the PEP. If you want to write a tool that checks style, please give it some clever name, don't name it after a PEP, so it's clear that whenever humans don't like what the tool says, it is a tool issue, not an issue with the PEP (which is merely intended to guide humans, not to require them to follow it every time).
FWIW I am happy that pep8 exist! It can be very useful and I use it myself. But I always let it know who's boss. :-)
lancelote, danielcorreia, marz619, eviljoe, alexandre and 147 morennemkin, ryneeverett, sigmavirus24, adrianbroher, dckc and 19 moreorsenthil, CuriousLearner, hjc, eliasdorneles, safo-bora and 23 moreENuge, marshallward, xi2008wang, yixizhang, azobnin and 6 moreMarxSoul55, JoseKilo and ovwane
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4