A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://github.com/Level/abstract-level/issues/6 below:

Decide on naming of modules · Issue #6 · Level/abstract-level · GitHub

With abstract-level, there is no "down" or "up" anymore. For example, memdown does not have to be wrapped with levelup. This means level-mem could just do module.exports = require('memdown') to export (largely) the same functionality as before. Which begs the question, should we:

  1. Keep memdown (as an abstract-level database); deprecate level-mem (as a levelup db)
  2. Deprecate memdown (as an abstract-leveldown database); move code to level-mem (as an abstract-level db)
  3. Deprecate both and create a new memory-level package (as well as leveldb-level, indexeddb-level, etc)

@Level/core thoughts?


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4