Description of the problem
Searching for "PyGMT" in Google Scholar shows that there are already some papers citing/mentioning/acknowledging PyGMT. Here are the searching results: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=PyGMT&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&as_ylo=2017&as_yhi=
From the searching results, you'll see that people are citing PyGMT in various ways:
PyGMT should document the correct/recommended way for citation.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4