Ramiro Polla wrote: > Ramiro Polla wrote: >> Michel Bardiaux wrote: >>> M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> >>>> That said, I don't like the design of the grabbing code at all. >>>> IMHO it would >>>> be much cleaner to simply run ffmpeg -f v4l2 -i /dev/video0 or >>>> whatever, >>>> dropping the whole concept of a default grabbing device used if no >>>> input is >>>> specified. >>>> >>> FWIW I agree. >>> >> Me too =). >> >> The code for using a default grabbing device is really buggy (the >> grabbing interfaces depend on what has been set for output). > It seems this would be just removing a bunch of redundant code (like > Michael said), and making few adaptations to the existing -i code. > One problem with -i <grab device> is when you want to use the default > grab device. This could be accomplished by (some suggestions): > a) using the '-' character Please dont, '-' generally means stdin. AAMOF ffmpeg -i - < /dev/video0 *should* work as expected. > b) making -grab mean -i <default device>. Why do you insist on having a default grab device? > > Ramiro Polla -- Michel Bardiaux R&D Director T +32 [0] 2 790 29 41 F +32 [0] 2 790 29 02 E mailto:mbardiaux at mediaxim.be Mediaxim NV/SA Vorstlaan 191 Boulevard du Souverain Brussel 1160 Bruxelles http://www.mediaxim.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4