M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes: > >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: >>> Alex Beregszaszi wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>>> If you really want to be that gnucentric, >>>>> do you know why everyone who uses visual <bluescreen, restarts system) C++ >>>>> has a problem with understanding the different between standart and gcc? >>>>> we HATE gcc and we certainly are not, where not and never will be >>>>> gnucentric, ffmpeg code is stanard C, everything else is under #ifdefs >>>>> like asm, always_inline and so on >>>>> >>>>> it must be something like >>>>> * user sees vc++ fail with random program >>>>> * user sees gcc to suceed with same random program >>>>> * user concludes that program is written specifically for gcc as he knows >>>>> MS always follows all standards very carefully >>>> Thats a great point here. >>> It's like the difference between people who prefer to use C99 and the >>> ones who prefer to use a real-world compiler. >>> >>> Anyway, C99 doesn't cover inline ASM AFAIK so you can't seriously say >>> that FFMPEG is not designed for gcc. >> you know very well that they are under #ifdefs (some of the other people >> who claimed that ffmpeg where written for gcc may or may not have known that >> but you do as you have worked with the code) so could you maybe spare >> us from this trolling >> if you want i can ask our root at mphq team to create a new mailing list >> for random rants, trolling, flames and such ... > > We could even have posts from certain individuals automatically > redirected to that list... As I'm leaving DivX tomorrow you will see me much less around here. Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4