Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> [...] >> >>> - inline functions - broken (very): symbol exporting behaviour is the >>> exact opposite of the standard. Upshot is, anyone trying to use (compile >>> or link to) ffmpeg with a C99 compiler would appear to be in for a nasty >>> headache at link time (someone using a C99 compiler might like to >>> comment on this?). >>> >> iam not aware of any bugreports about this, not to mention iam not aware >> of any difference betweem gcc and C99 about "static inline" care to >> elaborate on this? we dont use non static inline or extern inline or anything >> like that ... >> > > As somebody responsible for a fully C99 compliant compiler I'd be very > curious to find out more about the original claim as well. > This was taken from the gcc C99 compliance page at http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html, under the "Further Notes" section... Here's some more detailed discussion on the gcc mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-11/msg00006.html > Thanks, > Roman. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel at mplayerhq.hu > http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4