Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes: > Hi > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: >> Alex Beregszaszi wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >>>If you really want to be that gnucentric, >> >>do you know why everyone who uses visual <bluescreen, restarts system) C++ >> >>has a problem with understanding the different between standart and gcc? >> >>we HATE gcc and we certainly are not, where not and never will be >> >>gnucentric, ffmpeg code is stanard C, everything else is under #ifdefs >> >>like asm, always_inline and so on >> >> >> >>it must be something like >> >>* user sees vc++ fail with random program >> >>* user sees gcc to suceed with same random program >> >>* user concludes that program is written specifically for gcc as he knows >> >> MS always follows all standards very carefully >> > >> >Thats a great point here. >> >> It's like the difference between people who prefer to use C99 and the >> ones who prefer to use a real-world compiler. >> >> Anyway, C99 doesn't cover inline ASM AFAIK so you can't seriously say >> that FFMPEG is not designed for gcc. > > you know very well that they are under #ifdefs (some of the other people > who claimed that ffmpeg where written for gcc may or may not have known that > but you do as you have worked with the code) so could you maybe spare > us from this trolling > if you want i can ask our root at mphq team to create a new mailing list > for random rants, trolling, flames and such ... We could even have posts from certain individuals automatically redirected to that list... -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru at inprovide.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4