Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes: > Hi > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote: >> Reimar Doeffinger wrote: >> >Hello, >> >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:18:47PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote: >> >>Alex Beregszaszi wrote: >> >>>>... >> >>>> switch(depth){ >> >>>> case 24: >> >>>> for(i = 0; i < avctx->height; i++){ >> >>>> memcpy(ptr, buf, n); >> >>>> buf += n; >> >>>> ptr += linesize; >> >>>> } >> >>>> break; >> >>>>... >> >>>> >> >>>>Should it not be memcpy(ptr, buf, linesize) ? >> >>>n probably means input linesize, while linesize is the output linesize. >> >>Yes. >> >> >> >>>I guess 24bit BMP doesnt stores the padding 1 byte. >> >>Actually it does, see >> >> >> >> /* Line size in file multiple of 4 */ >> >> n = (avctx->width * (depth / 8) + 3) & ~3; >> >> >> >>and that's why I am suspicious. >> > >> >Neither is right, avctx->width * (depth >> 3) is the right value. >> >> Yes. Patch attached. > > looks ok assuming mans has no objections Fine by me, assuming it is correct. I don't have any specs or samples at hand. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru at inprovide.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4