Hi On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote: > Reimar Doeffinger wrote: > >Hello, > >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:18:47PM +0100, Michel Bardiaux wrote: > >>Alex Beregszaszi wrote: > >>>>... > >>>> switch(depth){ > >>>> case 24: > >>>> for(i = 0; i < avctx->height; i++){ > >>>> memcpy(ptr, buf, n); > >>>> buf += n; > >>>> ptr += linesize; > >>>> } > >>>> break; > >>>>... > >>>> > >>>>Should it not be memcpy(ptr, buf, linesize) ? > >>>n probably means input linesize, while linesize is the output linesize. > >>Yes. > >> > >>>I guess 24bit BMP doesnt stores the padding 1 byte. > >>Actually it does, see > >> > >> /* Line size in file multiple of 4 */ > >> n = (avctx->width * (depth / 8) + 3) & ~3; > >> > >>and that's why I am suspicious. > > > >Neither is right, avctx->width * (depth >> 3) is the right value. > > Yes. Patch attached. looks ok assuming mans has no objections [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal. -- Aristotle -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070129/e83eaf60/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4