On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:12:15 -0000 (GMT) M?ns Rullg?rd <mru at inprovide.com> wrote: > > Diego Biurrun said: > > I've been thinking about $subject since the last round of build system > > changes that broke MPlayer. We had to disable a ton of stuff in > > libavformat that we do not really need. It seems to me that the > > underlying problem is that libavformat has become kind of a grab bag > > that contains a multitude of more or less unrelated things. > > > > We have support for grab devices and networking protocols as well as > > multimedia container formats. IMO libavformat should only contain the > > latter, the former to could go into something like libavprotocols and > > libavgrab. > > > > Thoughts? > > I agree. I'd prefer a name like libavio over libavprotocols though, but > that's details. I absolutely agree. I already thought about spliting a libavio and libavgrab. That would be great. Aurel
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4