Hi On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:25:47AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:08:34PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > scrap the last email, here's one that includes another patch that wasn't > > applied yet either, but has been approved [1]. > > resubmiting several approved patches merged into one reduces your chances > to near zero to get them applied such mails confuse the already busy few > who do apply patches, its like people opening new bugreports which > contain a list of bugreports which havnt been fixed yet > > a simply reply to the forgotten patch is much better (assuming you use > a working MUA) and as iam already flaming ... dont use subjects like: "[PATCH] actually here's one more" rather try one which describes the patch think of poor idiots like me who look through a list of "open" patches and they have such subjects [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong. -- Voltaire -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070128/34982a08/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4