Hello, On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:10:56PM -0200, Ramiro Polla wrote: > Ulrich von Zadow wrote: > >>It doesn't provide an API for C#, Fortran, Pascal, Java, or > >>even C89. > >>C++ should be no exception. > >> > > > >C#, Fortran, Pascal and Java would require a major effort for support. > >C++ requires these few lines. Please don't willfully make life harder > >for C++ programmers. > > > I am also against willfully making life harder for other programmers. > Why go through the effort of changing something for the sole reason of > making life harder for other programmers? > > Well, this seems to be the way FFmpeg works... Absolute compliance to > one standard, and make life harder for anything else. Please don't misunderstand my comments as wanting to make things more difficult, but I would prefer it to have some kind of system, not some randomly placed stuff. Currently these public headers have it: avcodec.h avformat.h avutil.h These don't: opt.h avio.h rtp.h rtsp.h rtspcodes.h avutil.h common.h mathematics.h integer.h rational.h intfloat_readwrite.h md5.h adler32.h log.h fifo.h If this is as it is intended, I will drop the subject, to me it looks like this is just how it "happened to be". Greetings, Reimar D?ffinger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4