RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 26 21:10:56 CET 2007 · https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-January/028091.html

Ulrich von Zadow wrote:
>> It doesn't provide an API for C#, Fortran, Pascal, Java, or
>> even C89.
>> C++ should be no exception.
>>     
>
> C#, Fortran, Pascal and Java would require a major effort for support.
> C++ requires these few lines. Please don't willfully make life harder
> for C++ programmers.
>   
I am also against willfully making life harder for other programmers. 
Why go through the effort of changing something for the sole reason of 
making life harder for other programmers?

Well, this seems to be the way FFmpeg works... Absolute compliance to 
one standard, and make life harder for anything else.

I don't see it as something so bad though. It shows how much the 
developers are willing to follow their principles (and standards).

Ramiro Polla

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-January/028091.html below:

[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Dead code cleanup