RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 24 11:46:48 CET 2007 · https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-January/027872.html

Michael Niedermayer wrote:

>>  I guess at this point I am really curious to understand why do you
>>consider ABI level dependency to be a big deal ? Do you actually expect
>>anybody to use libavutil independently of libavcodec/libavformat ? 
>>    
>>
>
>i wouldnt be surprissed if some distribution do actually use shared libavutil
>
>
>  
>
swscale doesn't even build with shared libavutil, but I couldn't fix it.
It would be a nice feature to have

>>We don't make a shared library out of libavutil, do we ?
>>    
>>
>
>dunno, if --enable-shared doesnt result in a shared libavutil then thats
>a bug
>
>[...]
>  
>
--enable-shared *does* build a dynamic libavutil

 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f

 Sponsor:
 Questo inverno scaldale il cuore, con il prezioso calore di un Diamante.
* Non lasciarti sfuggire lo sconto del 20% riservato a te! 
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5630&d=24-1

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-January/027872.html below:

[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: [Ffmpeg-cvslog] r7570 - trunk/libavutil/fifo.c