Hi On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:28:21PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > Alex Beregszaszi <alex at fsn.hu> writes: > > > Hi, > > > >> > Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer every > >> > time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but without > >> > advancing the pointer? > >> > >> are they needed for any code? if no theres no sense in adding them > >> currently, also i dont like redundancy (LE/BE* / bytestream_show()) > > > > I'm doing some code, which needs this. Currently it has LES_8/16/32 for > > writing such values, and LE_8/16/32 for reading. > > > > Which is better, adding LES_ or extending bytestream_ and replacing all > > LE_ occurances too? > > Do not add anything with generic names like LE_*. what about AV_<L|B><R|W><2|4|8> ? so that for example AV_BW4 would be a big endian 32bit write ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20070104/1c77ca86/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4