Hi, > > Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer every > > time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but without > > advancing the pointer? > > are they needed for any code? if no theres no sense in adding them > currently, also i dont like redundancy (LE/BE* / bytestream_show()) I'm doing some code, which needs this. Currently it has LES_8/16/32 for writing such values, and LE_8/16/32 for reading. Which is better, adding LES_ or extending bytestream_ and replacing all LE_ occurances too? -- Alex Beregszaszi
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4