A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-January/027020.html below:

[Ffmpeg-devel] [RFC] bytestream show and change

[Ffmpeg-devel] [RFC] bytestream show and change [Ffmpeg-devel] [RFC] bytestream show and changeAlex Beregszaszi alex
Thu Jan 4 19:17:33 CET 2007
Hi,

> > Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer every
> > time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but without
> > advancing the pointer?
> 
> are they needed for any code? if no theres no sense in adding them
> currently, also i dont like redundancy (LE/BE* / bytestream_show())

I'm doing some code, which needs this. Currently it has LES_8/16/32 for
writing such values, and LE_8/16/32 for reading.

Which is better, adding LES_ or extending bytestream_ and replacing all
LE_ occurances too?

--
Alex Beregszaszi




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4