On 2007-01-03 12:48:37 -0600, Ryan Martell <rdm4 at martellventures.com> said: > On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Alex Beregszaszi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>>>>> Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer every >>>>>> time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but without >>>>>> advancing the pointer? >>>>> What about "peek" and "poke" :-) >>>> >>>> I have chosen _show as it is present in the bitstream functions too. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Beregszaszi >>> >>> That was a *joke* - understandable only by those who did BASIC on what >>> passed for PCs in the '80s; anyone here who had a Sinclair? >> >> It was available on C64 too :) >> >> And I like the peek/poke approach. > > And on Apple ][+'s... > > -Ryan and on TRS-80s and CoCos (Tandy / Radio Shack [Color] Computers) etc. etc. etc. :) --
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4