On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Alex Beregszaszi wrote: > Hi, > >>>>> Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer >>>>> every >>>>> time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but >>>>> without >>>>> advancing the pointer? >>>> What about "peek" and "poke" :-) >>> >>> I have chosen _show as it is present in the bitstream functions too. >>> >>> -- >>> Alex Beregszaszi >> >> That was a *joke* - understandable only by those who did BASIC on >> what >> passed for PCs in the '80s; anyone here who had a Sinclair? > > It was available on C64 too :) > > And I like the peek/poke approach. And on Apple ][+'s... -Ryan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4