Hi, > >>> Since we have bytestream_put and _get which changes the pointer every > >>> time, anyone against _change and _show which does the same, but without > >>> advancing the pointer? > >> What about "peek" and "poke" :-) > > > > I have chosen _show as it is present in the bitstream functions too. > > > > -- > > Alex Beregszaszi > > That was a *joke* - understandable only by those who did BASIC on what > passed for PCs in the '80s; anyone here who had a Sinclair? It was available on C64 too :) And I like the peek/poke approach. -- Alex Beregszaszi
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4