Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willis_Graham_Act below:
Willis Graham Act - Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Willis Graham Act of 1921 effectively established telephone companies as natural monopolies, citing that "there is nothing to be gained by local competition in the telephone industry."[1] The law effectively released AT&T from terms of its Kingsbury Commitment, allowing the company to acquire competing telephone companies under the oversight of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC).[2] It was enacted by the 67th United States Congress and signed into law by President Warren G. Harding on June 10, 1921.[3][4]
The American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) was incorporated in 1885 as a wholly owned subsidiary of American Bell. On December 30, 1899, AT&T acquired the assets of American Bell and became the parent company of the Bell System.[5] For extending telephone service nationwide, new technologies had to be developed to propagate telephony signals over ever-increasing distances. Until Bell's second patent expired in 1894, Bell Telephone was the only company that could legally operate telephone systems in the United States. Between 1894 and 1904, after Bell's patents expired, over six thousand independent telephone companies arose in the US.
The rise of these new companies brought new problems. Telephone customers on different carriers had no way of contacting each other—there was no inter-connectivity between carriers.[5] In order to connect all of the telephone customers, AT&T began acquiring independent telephone providers, much to the dismay of remaining independents.[6] These independents complained to the attorney general that AT&T was eliminating the competition. In response to this, the attorney general referred the case to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), which began an investigation. AT&T then agreed to a settlement, now known as the Kingsbury Commitment.[6] This consisted of a letter from AT&T stating that "Bell agreed to provide interconnection to the independents and to refrain from further acquisitions."[7]
However, AT&T continued to acquire more non-competing companies. The Willis-Graham Act, which was passed in 1921, shifted merger oversight to the ICC, lessening AT&T's constraints on the acquisition of competitors.[8] This essentially repealed the Kingsbury Commitment. Because of this, by 1924 AT&T had acquired 223 of the 234 independent telephone companies with the approval of the ICC.[1]
- ^ a b Lloyd, Mark. "AT&T and Whatever happened to Antitrust?". Retrieved 12 Jul 2024.
- ^ Wilson, Kevin G. (2000). Deregulating telecommunications: U.S. and Canadian telecommunications, 1840-1997. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 19. ISBN 0-8476-9825-4.
- ^ Loeb, G. Hamilton (1977). "The Communications Act Policy Toward Competition: A Failure to Communicate". Duke Law Journal. 1978 (1). Retrieved January 22, 2024.
- ^ Pub. L. 67–15, 42 Stat. 27
- ^ a b "A Brief History: Origins". History of AT&T. Retrieved 3 May 2011.
- ^ a b Wilson, Kevin G. (2000). Deregulating telecommunications: U.S. and Canadian telecommunications, 1840-1997. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 17. ISBN 0-8476-9825-4.
- ^ Huber, Kellogg, Thorne (1999). Federal telecommunications law. Aspen Publishers. p. 215. ISBN 0-7355-0647-7.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
- ^ Northrup, Cynthia Clark (2003). The American economy: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. pp. 351. ISBN 1-57607-866-3.
United States antitrust law
Statutes and
regulations
Supreme Court
case law Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 1 case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 2 case law
Other Sherman
Antitrust Act cases
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association (1897)
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States (1899)
- Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)
- Swift & Co. v. United States (1905)
- Loewe v. Lawlor (1908)
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911)
- United States v. Terminal Railroad Association (1912)
- Chicago Board of Trade v. United States (1918)
- United States v. Colgate & Co. (1919)
- Federal Baseball Club v. National League (1922)
- United States v. General Electric Co. (1926)
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States (1939)
- Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States (1940)
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC (1941)
- United States v. Masonite Corp. (1942)
- United States v. Univis Lens Co. (1942)
- Parker v. Brown (1943)
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n (1944)
- Associated Press v. United States (1945)
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States (1945)
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. (1946)
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. (1948)
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1948–1950)
- Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1951)
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (1953)
- Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. (1953)
- United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. (1955)
- Radovich v. National Football League (1957)
- Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959)
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1960)
- Haywood v. National Basketball Association (1971)
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. (1971)
- Flood v. Kuhn (1972)
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. (1979)
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (1980)
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. (1982)
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (1985)
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992)
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California (1993)
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006)
- North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC (2015)
Interstate Commerce Act
case law
Clayton Antitrust Act
case law
FTC Act case law
Robinson–Patman Act
case law
Other cases
Other federal
case law
Ongoing
litigation ‡
Related topics
‡ date of filing
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3