A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_7 below:

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 7, 2009

The result of the discussion was

Blanked

Well duh.

Ten Pound Hammer

and his otters •

(Many ottersOne hammerHELP) 16:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another redirect to a special page. Precedent seems to indicate that these should be deleted, as none of them work due to technical restraints (i.e., typing in the shortcut dumps you at the actual redirect page instead of the target). I see no reason to redirect a talk page to Special:Contributions anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many ottersOne hammerHELP) 16:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was

delete

. From

Wikipedia:Redirect#What do we use redirects for?

: "Articles, including redirects, whose titles are either all initial caps or only first word capitalised are found via "Go" using a case-insensitive match." –

Black Falcon (Talk) 21:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion: AKAGI is a capitalization of the main article's name. This redirect serves no functional purpose, but it does take up a slot in the pop-up search box BigbossSNK (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was

delete

.

Wizardman 02:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a no-longer required transitional redirect from the period when AM and FM stations had individual templates. This one is especially problematic due to the potential for confusion between Portland, Maine, and Portland, Oregon, and this re-directs ambiguous name. Dravecky (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was

delete

.

Wizardman 02:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a no-longer required transitional redirect from the period when AM and FM stations had individual templates. This one is especially problematic due to the potential for confusion between Portland, Maine, and Portland, Oregon, and this re-directs ambiguous name. Dravecky (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4