A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MRSC below:

User talk:MRSC - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archives

Hallo, Thanks for adding the infobox to Beryl (company), but you added an ambiguous link to Bath. Here's my boiler-plate message ...

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 12:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MRSC!

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Combined authorities indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I noticed you made the GeoJSON page for Airfield ward. My question is how did you get the data for the 1978 boundaries? TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them have been published by the ONS / UK Data service [1] but watch out for older ones marked "synthetically generated" as they are far too imprecise. There are maps of the 1965 boundaries here. [2] MRSC (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mayor and cabinet executives has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackheath (Lewisham ward), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juliet Campbell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Brighton and Hove City Council.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of the almost-blanking of the template you originally created and filled many years ago?

See... EDIT:974255512.

Was there any discussion before this was done? I am not aware of any.

This template was very useful as it originally listed every UK prefix, by type, in a very compact format, with links out for specific types and examples.

-- 92.18.74.255 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thurrock Council coat of arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from South Lakeland District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a move discussion about moving the name to Victoria Park, Finchley, and I am notifying you as I see that you did the reverese move back in 2010. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westborough (ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westborough (ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Romford has been listed for good article reassessment. The discussion is located at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Romford/1. Hog Farm Talk 03:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Town (Colchester ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Town (Colchester ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Craven District has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In what possible way does it not exist? Danners430 (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does not exist yet. It has not yet been constituted. The legislation creating it has not been introduced to parliament. MRSC (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Devons Road DLR station

is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to

Wikipedia's policies and guidelines

or whether it should be

deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devons Road DLR station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for the changes you are currently making to this article. I am sure it will be much improved when you have finished. At present, you have made 42 amendments in about 16 hours. This means a huge list of changes in the page's history, and a lot of work for others who are watching the page. Could you possibly consider drafting up all your planned changes using your sandbox, and then doing a single update? Thanks. Masato.harada (talk) 11:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. MRSC (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) This is a genuine problem - making lots of small edits in a short space of time causes problems with watchlists and makes it difficult to read histories. Please consider either making one large edit or using your sandbox. Danners430 (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No. MRSC (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are you going to contribute contructively to a genuine concern that an editor has raised or are you going to just be dismissive and rude? Danners430 (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elm Park tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elm Park tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elm Park tube station for comments about the article, and Talk:Elm Park tube station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MRSC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coat of arms of Greater London, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crossrail 2 navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4