Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Berchanhimez below:

User talk:Berchanhimez - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

• Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. You may feel free to ping me using the {{ping|Berchanhimez}} template to ensure I see your response.

• Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.

• Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
• Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

• To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
• You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dragon Age: The Veilguard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Raladic (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my SNOW closure of the merge proposal was extremely unusual, considering the overwhelming opposition to the proposal (more than 3-to-1 against) with almost all !votes based on policy. I highly discourage you from attempting to reopen a discussion in such a manner again. ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: I stand by the reversion. SNOW is not just based on numbers but based on strength of the arguments being made. There were strong arguments for the merge proposal and closing it after barely one day (26 hours by my count) of it being posted, and barely 24 hours since people had started posting !votes rather than general discussion - that's not appropriate. SNOW closures that early should only be done when there is zero valid argument against the proposal. I'm not going to revert the other person who SNOW closed it (though I would support someone else doing it), but I am considering just taking that article to AfD. An AfD would draw more editors from outside the topic area to contribute - specifically those who are trying to be neutral rather than making comments like (this is) a new era or (this will) be regarded as a turning point in the Middle Eastern and Iran-Israel conflict or similar. Those sorts of comments are not policy based and should've been completely discounted by someone determining if it's snowing or not - because they are not PAG based at all. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 22:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW is founded in a number of factors. There were not only overwhelming numbers against, but the arguments in favor of merging were few in number and generally poorly reflective policy. Superior arguments and far greater numbers indicated a SNOW situation. Your reversal of the closure after you had already engaged in the conversation ("involved", as they say) was, at best, inadvisable and, more likely, contrary to standards. You are discouraged from similar actions in the future. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you review my topic? And could you please let me know if it’s credible to be an actors Wikipedia profile? --Marea Winy (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4