Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1790 below:
Copyright Act of 1790 - Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
First U.S. federal legislation on copyright
The Copyright Act of 1790 in the Columbian Centinel
The Copyright Act of 1790 was the first federal copyright act to be instituted in the United States, though most of the states had passed various legislation securing copyrights in the years immediately following the Revolutionary War. The stated object of the act was the "encouragement of learning," and it achieved this by securing authors the "sole right and liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing and vending" the copies of their "maps, charts, and books" for a term of 14 years, with the right to renew for one additional 14-year term should the copyright holder still be alive.
Early developments[edit]
The 1710 British Statute of Anne did not apply to the American colonies.[3] Only three private copyright acts were passed in the colonies prior to 1783.[4] That year, the Continental Congress concluded "that nothing is more properly a man's own an the fruit of his study, and that the protection and security of literary property would greatly tends to encourage genius and to promote useful discoveries."[5] But the Continental Congress had no power under the Articles of Confederation to authorize a federal copyright law;[5] instead, it passed a resolution encouraging the states "to secure to the authors or publishers of any new book not hitherto printed... the copy right of such books for a certain time not less than fourteen years from the first publication; and to secure to the said authors, if they shall survive the term first mentioned,... the copy right of such books for another term of time no less than fourteen years".[4][6] By 1786, the only state that had not implemented a copyright law was Delaware.[7] Seven states modeled their law on the Statute of Anne and the Continental Congress' resolution, providing two fourteen-year terms. The remaining five states used non-renewable terms, which lasted fourteen, twenty or twenty-one years.[7]
James Madison of Virginia and Charles C. Pinckney of South Carolina introduced proposals for the Copyright Clause during the Constitutional Convention 1787.[8] The Copyright Clause authorized Congress "to promote the progress of science and useful arts" with utilitarian regimes for copyright and patent.[7]
Legislative history[edit]
During the first session of the 1st United States Congress in 1789, the House of Representatives considered enacting a copyright law. The historian Davit Ramsay petitioned Congress seeking to restrict the publication of his History of the American Revolution on April 15. Congressmen Thomas Tudor Tucker, Alexander White, and Benjamin Huntington examined his claims and a copyright committee consisting of Huntington, Lambert Cadwalader, and Benjamin Contee began drafting the legislation on April 20. Jedidiah Morse, Nicholas Pike, and Hannah Adams each also petitioned Congress with their interests in restricting the printing of texts. Their bill moved to the Committee of the Whole House in June, but the matter was postponed in anticipation of the first recess, to be taken up again when the House reconvened.[9]
Both houses of Congress pursued a copyright law more pointedly during 1790's second session. They responded to President George Washington's first 1790 State of the Union Address,[10][11] in which he urged Congress to pass legislation designed for "the promotion of Science and Literature" so as to better educate the public.[12][13] This led to the Patent Act of 1790 and, shortly thereafter, the Copyright Act of 1790.
House of Representatives[edit]
The scope of what works would be covered by the law's exclusivity was contended in the House. When he reintroduced the matter, Aedanus Burke wanted to establish a first law about copyright regarding "literary property", but Alexander White called for the expansion of copyright beyond writings on the behalf of Jedidiah Morse, who believed unauthorized copying of his American Geography would hurt his business.[14]
The need to re-raise the copyright issue, among other items left unresolved at the end of the first session, required the House to clarify some order of business problems over whether or not they could reopen unfinished business from a previous session.[15] That settled, the House established a drafting committee for the law on February 1, chaired by Abraham Baldwin.[16]
The bill was signed into law on May 31, 1790 by George Washington and published in its entirety throughout the country shortly after. The act granted copyright for a term of "fourteen years from the time of recording the title thereof" and one optional renewal.[7] It restricted books, maps, and charts.[17] Although musical compositions were not mentioned in the text of the act, and would not be expressly covered by copyright until the Copyright Act of 1831, they were routinely registered under the 1790 Act as "books".[17] The act also did not mention paintings or drawings, which were not covered until the enactment of the Copyright Act of 1870.[18]
The British Statute of Anne was used as a basis.[7] The first sentences of the two laws are almost identical. Both require registration in order for a work to receive copyright protection; similarly, both require that copies of the work be deposited in officially designated repositories such as the Library of Congress in the United States, and the Oxford and Cambridge universities in the United Kingdom. The Statute of Anne and the Copyright Act of 1790 both provided for an initial term of 14 years, renewable once by living authors for an additional 14 years, for works not yet published. The Statute of Anne differed from the 1790 Act, however, in providing a 21-year term of restriction, with no option for renewal, for works already published at the time the law went into effect (1710).[19] The 1790 Act only offered a 14-year term for previously published works.[citation needed]
Newspaper advert: "United States and Foreign Copyright. Patents and Trade-Marks A Copyright will protect you from Pirates. And make you a fortune."
The Copyright Act of 1790 applied exclusively to citizens of the United States;[17] works created outside the United States or by people who were not U.S. citizens were not copyrightable in the U.S. until the International Copyright Act of 1891.[18] Consequently, various foreign authors, such as Charles Dickens, complained about not receiving royalty payments for copies of their work sold in the U.S.[20]
At the time, works only received protection under federal statutory copyright if the statutory formalities, such as a proper copyright notice, were satisfied. If this was not the case, the work immediately entered into the public domain. In 1834 the Supreme Court ruled in Wheaton v. Peters,[21] a case similar to the British Donaldson v Beckett of 1774, that although the author of an unpublished work had a common law right to control the first publication of that work, the author did not have a common law right to control reproduction following the first publication of the work.[7]
The act was first amended on April 29, 1802,[22] extending copyright restriction to etchings and, for the first time, requiring notice of copyright registration on copies of the works. The act did not specify a consequence of failing to include that notice; however, the federal case Ewer v. Coxe established that the failure to include notice invalidated a copyright.[18][23]
The act was also amended on February 15, 1819, to expand the jurisdiction of circuit courts (analogous to today's district courts) to allow them to hear cases on patents and copyrights.[24]
- ^ 2 Stat. 171
- ^ Ferch, Pricilla. "Statutory Damages Under the Copyright Act of 1976". Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. 15 (3). Retrieved July 27, 2018.
- ^ Bracha, Oren (2010). "The Adventures of the Statute of Anne in the Land of Unlimited Possibilities: The Life of a Legal Transplant" (PDF). Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 25: 1427, 1440. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-12.
- ^ a b Peter K, Yu (2007). Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Copyright and related rights. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 142. ISBN 978-0-275-98883-8.
- ^ a b Patry, William F. (2000) [1994]. "Introduction: The Constitutional Clause". Copyright Law and Practice. BNA. ISBN 978-0871796851. OCLC 30355355.
- ^ Resolution passed by the Continental Congress, recommending the several States to secure to such Authors or Publishers of New Books the Copyright of such Books, May 2, 1783, reprinted in Copyright Enactments, 1783-1900: Comprising the Copyright Resolution of the Colonial Congress, 1783; the Copyright Laws of the Original States, 1783-1786; the Constitutional Provision Concerning Copyright Legislation, and the Public and Private Copyright Laws Enacted by Congress from 1790 to 1900; Together with the Presidential Proclamations Regarding International Copyright. Library of Congress. U.S. Copyright Office. 1900. p. 9.
- ^ a b c d e f Peter K, Yu (2007). Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Copyright and related rights. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-275-98883-8.
- ^ Donner, Irah (July 1992). "The Copyright Clause of the U. S. Constitution: Why Did the Framers Include It with Unanimous Approval?". The American Journal of Legal History. 36 (3): 361–378. doi:10.2307/845426. JSTOR 845426.
- ^ Solberg, Thorvald (1905). Copyright in Congress, 1789-1904. Washington : Govt. print. off. pp. 112–115.
- ^ Richardson, James D., ed. (1897). A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents. Vol. 1 (1905 ed.). Bureau of National Literature and Art. p. 67.
- ^ Solberg, Thorvald (1905). Copyright in Congress, 1789-1904. Washington : Govt. print. off. p. 117.
- ^ Washington, George (January 8, 1790). "State of the Union Address 1790". George Washington Mount Vernon. 2016 Mount Vernon Ladies' Association. Retrieved 2018-07-25.
- ^ Solberg, Thorvald (1905). Copyright in Congress, 1789-1904. Washington : Govt. print. off. pp. 115–116.
- ^ 1 Annals of Cong. 1117-8 (Joseph Gales, ed. 1790)
- ^ 1 Annals of Cong. 1110-2 (Joseph Gales, ed. 1790)
- ^ 1 Annals of Cong. 1143 (Joseph Gales, ed. 1790)
- ^ a b c Patry, William F. (2000) [1994]. "Introduction: The First Copyright Act". Copyright Law and Practice. BNA. ISBN 978-0871796851. OCLC 30355355. Retrieved May 24, 2014.
- ^ a b c Patry, William F. (2000) [1994]. "Introduction: Statutory Revision". Copyright Law and Practice. BNA. ISBN 978-0871796851. OCLC 30355355. Retrieved May 24, 2014.
- ^ Patry, William F. (2000) [1994]. "Introduction: England and the Statute of Anne". Copyright Law and Practice. BNA. ISBN 978-0871796851. OCLC 30355355. Retrieved May 24, 2014.
- ^ Hoern, Thomas (January 2016). "Charles Dickens and the international copyright law". Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 63 (2): 341–352.
- ^ Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591 (1834)
- ^ Solberg, Thorvald (1905). Copyright in Congress, 1789-1904. Washington : Govt. print. off. p. 84.
- ^ Ewer v. Coxe
- ^ Solberg, Thorvald (1905). Copyright in Congress, 1789-1904. Washington : Govt. print. off. p. 85.
Works related to Copyright Act of 1790 at Wikisource
U.S. Supreme Court Article I
case law
Enumeration Clause
of
Section II
Qualifications Clauses of Sections II
and
III
Elections Clause
of
Section IV
Speech or Debate Clause
of
Section VI
Origination Clause
of
Section VII
Presentment Clause
of Section VII
Taxing and Spending Clause
of
Section VIII
Commerce Clause
of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
- Brown v. Maryland (1827)
- Willson v. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co. (1829)
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois (1886)
- Swift & Co. v. United States (1905)
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. Malloy (1925)
- Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. (1935)
- Edwards v. California (1941)
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona (1945)
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison (1951)
- Miller Bros. Co. v. Maryland (1954)
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. (1959)
- National Bellas Hess v. Illinois (1967)
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. (1970)
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp. (1976)
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady (1977)
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission (1977)
- City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey (1978)
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland (1978)
- Reeves, Inc. v. Stake (1980)
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. (1981)
- Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas (1982)
- White v. Mass. Council of Construction Employers (1983)
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke (1984)
- Maine v. Taylor (1986)
- Healy v. Beer Institute, Inc. (1989)
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992)
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt (1992)
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon (1994)
- C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown (1994)
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy (1994)
- Granholm v. Heald (2005)
- United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority (2007)
- Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis (2008)
- Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne (2015)
- South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (2018)
- Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas (2019)
- National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (2023)
Others
Coinage Clause
of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Clause
of Section VIII
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. (1982)
- San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee (1987)
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. (1992)
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. (1995)
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board (1999)
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (2001)
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc. (2001)
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (2003)
- Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (2003)
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. (2014)
- POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. (2014)
- Matal v. Tam (2017)
- Iancu v. Brunetti (2019)
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. (2020)
Copyright Act of 1976
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. (1977)
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (1984)
- Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder (1985)
- Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985)
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid (1989)
- Stewart v. Abend (1990)
- Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co. (1991)
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (1994)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994)
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. (1996)
- Quality King Distributors Inc., v. L'anza Research International Inc. (1998)
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. (1998)
- New York Times Co. v. Tasini (2001)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003)
- MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005)
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick (2010)
- Golan v. Holder (2012)
- Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013)
- Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (2014)
- American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. (2014)
- Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. (2017)
- Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com (2019)
- Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. (2019)
- Allen v. Cooper (2020)
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (2020)
Other copyright cases
Other patent cases
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. (1908)
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde (1916)
- United States v. General Electric Co. (1926)
- United States v. Univis Lens Co. (1942)
- Altvater v. Freeman (1943)
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp. (1945)
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co. (1948)
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. (1950)
- Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. (1950)
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. (1961)
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. (1964)
- Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther (1964)
- Brulotte v. Thys Co. (1964)
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (1965)
- Graham v. John Deere Co. (1966)
- United States v. Adams (1966)
- Brenner v. Manson (1966)
- Lear, Inc. v. Adkins (1969)
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co. (1969)
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. (1971)
- Gottschalk v. Benson (1972)
- United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. (1973)
- Dann v. Johnston (1976)
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro Inc. (1976)
- Parker v. Flook (1978)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980)
- Diamond v. Diehr (1981)
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (1989)
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. (1990)
- Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. (1996)
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. (1997)
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. (1998)
- Dickinson v. Zurko (1999)
- Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank (1999)
- J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (2001)
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. (2002)
- Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. (2005)
- eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. (2006)
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006)
- LabCorp v. Metabolite, Inc. (2006)
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. (2007)
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (2007)
- Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. (2007)
- Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (2008)
- Bilski v. Kappos (2010)
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. (2011)
- Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. (2011)
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership (2011)
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. (2012)
- Kappos v. Hyatt (2012)
- Bowman v. Monsanto Co. (2013)
- Gunn v. Minton (2013)
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (2013)
- FTC v. Actavis, Inc. (2013)
- Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International (2014)
- Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. (2014)
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. (2015)
- Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015)
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (2016)
- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (2017)
- Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (2019)
Other trademark cases
Necessary and Proper Clause
of Section VIII
Habeas corpus Suspension Clause
of
Section IX
No Bills of Attainder or Ex post facto Laws Clause
of Section IX
Contract Clause
of
Section X Legal Tender Cases
Others
Import-Export Clause
of Section X
Compact Clause
of Section X
Copyright law of the United States
Statutes Pre-1976
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
Precedents
and rulings Supreme Court
- Wheaton v. Peters (1834)
- Baker v. Selden (1879)
- Trade-Mark Cases (1879)
- Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony (1884)
- Banks v. Manchester (1888)
- Callaghan v. Myers (1888)
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (1908)
- White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. (1908)
- Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States (1975)
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (1984)
- Feist v. Rural (1991)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994)
- Quality King v. L'anza (1998)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003)
- MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005)
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. (2010)
- Golan v. Holder (2012)
- Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013)
- American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. (2014)
- Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands (2017)
- Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com (2019)
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (2020)
- Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021)
- Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023)
Appeals courts
- Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc. (2d Cir. 1964)
- Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. (9th Cir. 1970)
- Eltra Corp. v. Ringer (4th Cir. 1978)
- Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates (9th Cir. 1978)
- Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc. (7th Cir. 1983)
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. (3d Cir. 1983)
- Fisher v. Dees (9th Cir. 1986)
- Whelan v. Jaslow (3d Cir. 1986)
- Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd. (5th Cir. 1988)
- Rogers v. Koons (2nd Cir. 1992)
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. (2d Cir. 1992)
- American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc. (2nd Cir. 1995)
- Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc.(9th Cir. 1997)
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. (2d Cir. 1998)
- Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp. (9th Cir. 2000)
- Nunez v. Caribbean Int'l News Corp. (1st Cir. 2000)
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (9th Cir. 2001)
- Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l (5th Cir. 2002)
- Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. (9th Cir. 2002 / 2003)
- In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (7th Cir. 2003)
- NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute (2d Cir. 2004)
- BMG Music v. Gonzalez (7th Cir. 2005)
- Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd. (2nd Cir. 2006)
- Blanch v. Koons (2nd Cir. 2006)
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (9th Cir. 2006)
- Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc. (2nd Cir. 2008)
- Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc. (9th Cir. 2010)
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha (2d Cir. 2011)
- Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2012)
- Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. (2d Cir. 2012)
- Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc (9th Cir. 2013)
- Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. (2d Cir. 2015)
- Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. (9th Cir. 2015)
- Naruto v. Slater (9th Cir. 2018)
Lower courts
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4