A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Socialist_Workers_'74_Campaign_Committee below:

Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1982 United States Supreme Court case

Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee Supreme Court of the United States Full case name Brown, et al. v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee (Ohio), et al. Docket no. 81-776 Citations 459 U.S. 87 (more)

103 S. Ct. 416; 74

L. Ed. 2d

250; 1982

U.S. LEXIS

169

Argument Oral argument Opinion announcement Opinion announcement Prior Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio States cannot require a minor political party to disclose its membership or associates, when doing so would jeopardize the safety of those persons.
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Majority Marshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, White, Blackmun (parts I, III, IV), Powell Concurrence Blackmun Concur/dissent O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens U.S. Const. amend. I

Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee, 459 U.S. 87 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with political speech, and whether a state could require a minor political party to disclose its membership, expenditures, and contributors.

At the time, most states required political parties to disclose their contributions and expenditures; in 1982, the Court ruled that the Socialist Workers Party, a minor party in Ohio, was not required to disclose its contributors or recipients, on the basis of retributive animus and harassment if party functionaries did so.[1]

U.S. Supreme Court Freedom of Speech Clause

case law

First Amendment to the United States Constitution Unprotected speech Clear and
present danger

and imminent
lawless action
Defamation and
false speech Fighting words and
the heckler's veto True threats Obscenity Speech integral
to criminal conduct Strict scrutiny Overbreadth and
Vagueness doctrines Symbolic speech
versus conduct Content-based
restrictions Content-neutral
restrictions In the
public forum Designated
public forum Nonpublic
forum Compelled speech Compelled subsidy
of others' speech Government grants
and subsidies Government speech Loyalty oaths School speech Public employees Hatch Act and
similar laws Licensing and
restriction of speech Commercial speech Campaign finance
and political speech Anonymous speech State action Official retaliation Boycotts Prisons

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4