A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/../atomic/../language/implicit_cast.html below:

Implicit conversions - cppreference.com

Implicit conversions are performed whenever an expression of some type T1 is used in context that does not accept that type, but accepts some other type T2; in particular:

The program is well-formed (compiles) only if there exists one unambiguous implicit conversion sequence from T1 to T2.

If there are multiple overloads of the function or operator being called, after the implicit conversion sequence is built from T1 to each available T2, overload resolution rules decide which overload is compiled.

Note: in arithmetic expressions, the destination type for the implicit conversions on the operands to binary operators is determined by a separate set of rules: usual arithmetic conversions.

[edit] Order of the conversions

Implicit conversion sequence consists of the following, in this order:

1) zero or one standard conversion sequence;

2) zero or one user-defined conversion;

3) zero or one standard conversion sequence (only if a user-defined conversion is used).

When considering the argument to a constructor or to a user-defined conversion function, only one standard conversion sequence is allowed (otherwise user-defined conversions could be effectively chained). When converting from one non-class type to another non-class type, only a standard conversion sequence is allowed.

A standard conversion sequence consists of the following, in this order:

1)

zero or one conversion from the following set:

2) zero or one numeric promotion or numeric conversion;

3) zero or one function pointer conversion;

(since C++17)

4) zero or one qualification conversion.

A user-defined conversion consists of zero or one non-explicit single-argument converting constructor or non-explicit conversion function call.

An expression e is said to be implicitly convertible to T2 if and only if T2 can be copy-initialized from e, that is the declaration T2 t = e; is well-formed (can be compiled), for some invented temporary t. Note that this is different from direct initialization (T2 t(e)), where explicit constructors and conversion functions would additionally be considered.

[edit] Contextual conversions

In the following contexts, the type bool is expected and the implicit conversion is performed if the declaration bool t(e); is well-formed (that is, an explicit conversion function such as explicit T::operator bool() const; is considered). Such expression e is said to be contextually converted to bool.

(since C++20) (since C++11)

In the following contexts, a context-specific type T is expected, and the expression e of class type E is only allowed if

(until C++14) (since C++14)

Such expression e is said to be contextually implicitly converted to the specified type T. Note that explicit conversion functions are not considered, even though they are considered in contextual conversions to bool.(since C++11)

#include <cassert>
 
template<typename T>
class zero_init
{
    T val;
public:
    zero_init() : val(static_cast<T>(0)) {}
    zero_init(T val) : val(val) {}
    operator T&() { return val; }
    operator T() const { return val; }
};
 
int main()
{
    zero_init<int> i;
    assert(i == 0);
 
    i = 7;
    assert(i == 7);
 
    switch (i) {}     // error until C++14 (more than one conversion function)
                      // OK since C++14 (both functions convert to the same type int)
    switch (i + 0) {} // always okay (implicit conversion)
}
[edit] Value transformations

Value transformations are conversions that change the value category of an expression. They take place whenever an expression appears as an operand of an operator that expects an expression of a different value category:

(since C++17) [edit] Lvalue-to-rvalue conversion

An lvalue(until C++11)A glvalue(since C++11) of any non-function, non-array type T can be implicitly converted to an rvalue(until C++11)a prvalue(since C++11):

If an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion from an incomplete type is required by a program, that program is ill-formed.

Given the object to which the lvalue(until C++11)glvalue(since C++11) refers as obj:

(until C++11)
(since C++11)

This conversion models the act of reading a value from a memory location into a CPU register.

[edit] Array-to-pointer conversion

An lvalue or rvalue of type “array of N T” or “array of unknown bound of T” can be implicitly converted to a prvalue of type “pointer to T”. If the array is a prvalue, temporary materialization occurs.(since C++17) The resulting pointer refers to the first element of the array (see Array-to-pointer decay for details).

[edit] Function-to-pointer conversion

An lvalue of function type can be implicitly converted to a prvalue pointer to that function. This does not apply to non-static member functions because lvalues that refer to non-static member functions do not exist.

Temporary materialization

A prvalue of any complete type T can be converted to an xvalue of the same type T. This conversion initializes a temporary object of type T from the prvalue by evaluating the prvalue with the temporary object as its result object, and produces an xvalue denoting the temporary object.

If T is a class or array of class type, it must have an accessible and non-deleted destructor.

struct S { int m; };
int i = S().m; // member access expects glvalue as of C++17;
               // S() prvalue is converted to xvalue

Temporary materialization occurs in the following situations:

Note that temporary materialization does not occur when initializing an object from a prvalue of the same type (by direct-initialization or copy-initialization): such object is initialized directly from the initializer. This ensures “guaranteed copy elision”.

(since C++17) [edit] Integral promotion

prvalues of small integral types (such as char) and unscoped enumeration types may be converted to prvalues of larger integral types (such as int). In particular, arithmetic operators do not accept types smaller than int as arguments, and integral promotions are automatically applied after lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, if applicable. This conversion always preserves the value.

The following implicit conversions in this section are classified as integral promotions.

Note that for a given source type, the destination type of integral promotion is unique, And all other conversions are not promotions. For example, overload resolution chooses char -> int (promotion) over char -> short (conversion).

[edit] Promotion from integral types

A prvalue of type bool can be converted to a prvalue of type int, with false becoming ​0​ and true becoming 1.

For a prvalue val of an integral type T except bool:

1)

If

val

is the result of an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to a

bit-field

,

2)

Otherwise (

val

is not converted from a bit-field),

3)

In the cases specified by item (1) (a converted bit-field not fitting

unsigned int

) or item (2) (

T

is one of the given character types),

val

can be converted to a prvalue of the first of the following types that can represent all the values of its underlying type:

(since C++11) [edit] Promotion from enumeration types

A prvalue of an unscoped enumeration type whose underlying type is not fixed can be converted to a prvalue of the first type from the following list able to hold their entire value range:

(since C++11)

A prvalue of an unscoped enumeration type whose underlying type is fixed can be converted to its underlying type. Moreover, if the underlying type is also subject to integral promotion, to the promoted underlying type. Conversion to the unpromoted underlying type is better for the purposes of overload resolution.

(since C++11) [edit] Floating-point promotion

A prvalue of type float can be converted to a prvalue of type double. The value does not change.

This conversion is called floating-point promotion.

[edit] Numeric conversions

Unlike the promotions, numeric conversions may change the values, with potential loss of precision.

[edit] Integral conversions

A prvalue of an integer type or of an unscoped enumeration type can be converted to any other integer type. If the conversion is listed under integral promotions, it is a promotion and not a conversion.

  1. ↑ This only applies if the arithmetic is two's complement which is only required for the exact-width integer types. Note, however, that at the moment all platforms with a C++ compiler use two's complement arithmetic.
[edit] Floating-point conversions

A prvalue of a floating-point type can be converted to a prvalue of any other floating-point type.

(until C++23)

A prvalue of a floating-point type can be converted to a prvalue of any other floating-point type with a greater or equal floating-point conversion rank.

A prvalue of a standard floating-point type can be converted to a prvalue of any other standard floating-point type.

static_cast can be used to explicitly convert a prvalue of floating-point type to any other floating-point type.

(since C++23)

If the conversion is listed under floating-point promotions, it is a promotion and not a conversion.

[edit] Floating–integral conversions

A prvalue of floating-point type can be converted to a prvalue of any integer type. The fractional part is truncated, that is, the fractional part is discarded.

A prvalue of integer or unscoped enumeration type can be converted to a prvalue of any floating-point type. The result is exact if possible.

[edit] Pointer conversions

A null pointer constant can be converted to any pointer type, and the result is the null pointer value of that type. Such conversion (known as null pointer conversion) is allowed to convert to a cv-qualified type as a single conversion, that is, it is not considered a combination of numeric and qualifying conversions.

A prvalue pointer to any (optionally cv-qualified) object type T can be converted to a prvalue pointer to (identically cv-qualified) void. The resulting pointer represents the same location in memory as the original pointer value.

A prvalue ptr of type “pointer to (possibly cv-qualified) Derived” can be converted to a prvalue of type “pointer to (possibly cv-qualified) Base”, where Base is a base class of Derived, and Derived is a complete class type. If the Base is inaccessible or ambiguous, the program is ill-formed.

[edit] Pointer-to-member conversions

A null pointer constant can be converted to any pointer-to-member type, and the result is the null member pointer value of that type. Such conversion (known as null member pointer conversion) is allowed to convert to a cv-qualified type as a single conversion, that is, it is not considered a combination of numeric and qualifying conversions.

A prvalue of type “pointer to member of Base of type (possibly cv-qualified) T” can be converted to a prvalue of type “pointer to member of Derived of type (identically cv-qualified) T”, where Base is a base class of Derived, and Derived is a complete class type. If Base is inaccessible, ambiguous, or virtual base of Derived or is a base of some intermediate virtual base of Derived, the program is ill-formed.

[edit] Boolean conversions

A prvalue of integral, floating-point, unscoped enumeration, pointer, and pointer-to-member types can be converted to a prvalue of type bool.

The value zero (for integral, floating-point, and unscoped enumeration) and the null pointer and the null pointer-to-member values become false. All other values become true.

In the context of a direct-initialization, a bool object may be initialized from a prvalue of type std::nullptr_t, including nullptr. The resulting value is false. However, this is not considered to be an implicit conversion.

(since C++11) [edit] Qualification conversions

Generally speaking:

The formal definition of “qualification conversion” is given below.

[edit] Similar types

Informally, two types are similar if, ignoring top-level cv-qualification:

For example:

Formally, type similarity is defined in terms of qualification-decomposition.

A qualification-decomposition of a type T is a sequence of components cv_i and P_i such that T is “cv_0 P_0 cv_1 P_1 ... cv_n−1 P_n−1 cv_n U” for non-negative n, where

If P_i designates an array, the cv-qualifiers cv_i+1 on the element type are also taken as the cv-qualifiers cv_i of the array.

// T is “pointer to pointer to const int”, it has 3 qualification-decompositions:
// n = 0 -> cv_0 is empty, U is “pointer to pointer to const int”
// n = 1 -> cv_0 is empty, P_0 is “pointer to”,
//          cv_1 is empty, U is “pointer to const int”
// n = 2 -> cv_0 is empty, P_0 is “pointer to”,
//          cv_1 is empty, P_1 is “pointer to”,
//          cv_2 is “const", U is “int”
using T = const int**;
 
// substitute any of the following type to U gives one of the decompositions:
// U = U0 -> the decomposition with n = 0: U0
// U = U1 -> the decomposition with n = 1: pointer to [U1]
// U = U2 -> the decomposition with n = 2: pointer to [pointer to [const U2]]
using U2 = int;
using U1 = const U2*;
using U0 = U1*;

Two types T1 and T2 are similar if there exists a qualification-decomposition for each of them, where all following conditions are satisfied for the two qualification-decompositions:

// the qualification-decomposition with n = 2:
// pointer to [volatile pointer to [const int]]
using T1 = const int* volatile *;
 
// the qualification-decomposition with n = 2:
// const pointer to [pointer to [int]]
using T2 = int** const;
 
// For the two qualification-decompositions above
// although cv_0, cv_1 and cv_2 are all different,
// they have the same n, U, P_0 and P_1,
// therefore types T1 and T2 are similar.
[edit] Combining cv-qualifications

In the description below, the longest qualification-decomposition of type Tn is denoted as Dn, and its components are denoted as cvn_i and Pn_i.

A prvalue expression of type T1 can be converted to type T2 if all following conditions are satisfied:

The qualification-combined type of two types T1 and T2 is a type T3 similar to T1 such that

(until C++20)

The qualification-combined type of two types T1 and T2 is a type T3 similar to T1, where D3 satisfies all following conditions:

A prvalue of type T1 can be converted to type T2 if the qualification-combined type of T1 and T2 is cv-unqualified T2.

(since C++20)
// longest qualification-decomposition of T1 (n = 2):
// pointer to [pointer to [char]]
using T1 = char**;
 
// longest qualification-decomposition of T2 (n = 2):
// pointer to [pointer to [const char]]
using T2 = const char**;
 
// Determining the cv3_i and T_i components of D3 (n = 2):
// cv3_1 = empty (union of empty cv1_1 and empty cv2_1)
// cv3_2 = “const” (union of empty cv1_2 and “const” cv2_2)
// P3_0 = “pointer to” (no array of unknown bound, use P1_0)
// P3_1 = “pointer to” (no array of unknown bound, use P1_1)
// All components except cv_2 are the same, cv3_2 is different from cv1_2,
// therefore add “const” to cv3_k for each k in [1, 2): cv3_1 becomes “const”.
// T3 is “pointer to const pointer to const char”, i.e., const char* const *.
using T3 = /* the qualification-combined type of T1 and T2 */;
 
int main()
{
    const char c = 'c';
    char* pc;
    T1 ppc = &pc;
    T2 pcc = ppc; // Error: T3 is not the same as cv-unqualified T2,
                  //        no implicit conversion.
 
    *pcc = &c;
    *pc = 'C';    // If the erroneous assignment above is allowed,
                  // the const object “c” may be modified.
}

Note that in the C programming language, const/volatile can be added to the first level only:

char** p = 0;
char * const* p1 = p;       // OK in C and C++
const char* const * p2 = p; // error in C, OK in C++
Function pointer conversions
void (*p)();
void (**pp)() noexcept = &p; // error: cannot convert to pointer to noexcept function
 
struct S
{
    typedef void (*p)();
    operator p();
};
void (*q)() noexcept = S(); // error: cannot convert to pointer to noexcept function
(since C++17) [edit] The safe bool problem

Until C++11, designing a class that should be usable in boolean contexts (e.g. if (obj) { ... }) presented a problem: given a user-defined conversion function, such as T::operator bool() const;, the implicit conversion sequence allowed one additional standard conversion sequence after that function call, which means the resultant bool could be converted to int, allowing such code as obj << 1; or int i = obj;.

One early solution for this can be seen in std::basic_ios, which initially defines operator void*, so that the code such as if (std::cin) {...} compiles because void* is convertible to bool, but int n = std::cout; does not compile because void* is not convertible to int. This still allows nonsense code such as delete std::cout; to compile.

Many pre-C++11 third party libraries were designed with a more elaborate solution, known as the Safe Bool idiom. std::basic_ios also allowed this idiom via LWG issue 468, and operator void* was replaced (see notes).

Since C++11, explicit bool conversion can also be used to resolve the safe bool problem.

[edit] Defect reports

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior CWG 170 C++98 the behavior of pointer-to-member conversions was unclear
if the derived class does not have the original member made clear CWG 172 C++98 enumeration type was promoted based on its underlying type based on its value range instead CWG 330
(N4261) C++98 the conversion from double* const (*p)[3]
to double const * const (*p)[3] was invalid made valid CWG 519 C++98 null pointer values were not guaranteed to be
preserved when converting to another pointer type always preserved CWG 616 C++98 the behavior of lvalue to rvalue conversion of
any uninitialized object and pointer objects
of invalid values was always undefined indeterminate unsigned char
is allowed; use of invalid pointers
is implementation-defined CWG 685 C++98 the underlying type of an enumeration type was
not prioritized in integral promotion if it is fixed prioritized CWG 707 C++98 integer to floating point conversion
had defined behavior in all cases the behavior is undefined if
the value being converted is
out of the destination range CWG 1423 C++11 std::nullptr_t was convertible to bool
in both direct- and copy-initialization direct-initialization only CWG 1773 C++11 a name expression that appears in a potentially-evaluated
expression such that the object named is not odr-used might
still be evaluated during an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion not evaluated CWG 1781 C++11 std::nullptr_t to bool was considered an implicit
conversion even though it is only valid for direct-initialization no longer considered
an implicit conversion CWG 1787 C++98 the behavior of reading from an indeterminate
unsigned char cached in a register was undefined made well-defined CWG 1981 C++11 contextual conversions considered explicit conversion functions not considered CWG 2140 C++11 it was unclear whether lvalue-to-rvalue conversions from
std::nullptr_t lvalues fetch these lvalues from memory not fetched CWG 2310 C++98 for derived-to-base pointer conversions and
base-to-derived pointer-to-member conversions,
the derived class type could be incomplete must be complete CWG 2484 C++20 char8_t and char16_t had different integral
promotion strategies, but they can fit both of them char8_t should be promoted
in the same way as char16_t CWG 2485 C++98 integral promotions involving bit-fields were not specified well improved the specification CWG 2813 C++23 temporary materialization would occur when an explicit
object member function of a class prvalue is invoked will not occur
in this case CWG 2861 C++98 a pointer to a type-inaccessible object could be
converted a pointer to a base class subobject the behavior is
undefined in this case CWG 2879 C++17 temporary materialization conversion was applied on prvalue
as an operand of an operator that expects glvalue not applied in some cases CWG 2899 C++98 lvalue-to-rvalue conversions could be applied to lvalues
designating objects with invalid value representations the behavior is
undefined in this case CWG 2901 C++98 the result of lvalue-to-rvalue conversion from an unsigned int
lvalue referring to an int object with value -1 was unclear made clear [edit] See also

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4