template< class T, class... Args >
struct is_constructible;
template< class T, class... Args >
struct is_trivially_constructible;
template< class T, class... Args >
struct is_nothrow_constructible;
If
T
is an object or reference type and the variable definition
T obj(std::declval<Args>()...);is well-formed, provides the member constant
value
equal to
true. In all other cases,
value
is
false.
For the purposes of this check, the variable definition is never interpreted as a function declaration, and the use of
std::declvalis not considered an
odr-use.
Access checksare performed as if from a context unrelated to
T
and any of the types in
Args
. Only the validity of the immediate context of the variable definition is considered.
2)Same as
(1), but the variable definition does not call any operation that is not trivial. For the purposes of this check, the call to
std::declvalis considered trivial.
3) Same as (1), but the variable definition is noexcept
.
If T
or any type in the parameter pack Args
is not a complete type, (possibly cv-qualified) void, or an array of unknown bound, the behavior is undefined.
If an instantiation of a template above depends, directly or indirectly, on an incomplete type, and that instantiation could yield a different result if that type were hypothetically completed, the behavior is undefined.
If the program adds specializations for any of the templates described on this page, the behavior is undefined.
[edit] Helper variable templates template< class T, class... Args >inline constexpr bool is_constructible_v =
inline constexpr bool is_trivially_constructible_v =
inline constexpr bool is_nothrow_constructible_v =
T
is constructible from Args...
, false otherwise
In many implementations, is_nothrow_constructible
also checks if the destructor throws because it is effectively noexcept(T(arg)). Same applies to is_trivially_constructible
, which, in these implementations, also requires that the destructor is trivial: GCC bug 51452 LWG issue 2116.
#include <iostream> #include <type_traits> class Foo { int v1; double v2; public: Foo(int n) : v1(n), v2() {} Foo(int n, double f) noexcept : v1(n), v2(f) {} }; int main() { auto is = [](bool o) { return (o ? "\t" "is " : "\t" "isn't "); }; std::cout << "Foo ...\n" << is(std::is_trivially_constructible_v<Foo, const Foo&>) << "Trivially-constructible from const Foo&\n" << is(std::is_trivially_constructible_v<Foo, int>) << "Trivially-constructible from int\n" << is(std::is_constructible_v<Foo, int>) << "Constructible from int\n" << is(std::is_nothrow_constructible_v<Foo, int>) << "Nothrow-constructible from int\n" << is(std::is_nothrow_constructible_v<Foo, int, double>) << "Nothrow-constructible from int and double\n"; }
Output:
Foo ... is Trivially-constructible from const Foo& isn't Trivially-constructible from int is Constructible from int isn't Nothrow-constructible from int is Nothrow-constructible from int and double[edit] See also
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4