template< class T >
struct is_copy_constructible;
template< class T >
struct is_trivially_copy_constructible;
template< class T >
struct is_nothrow_copy_constructible;
If T
is not a complete type, (possibly cv-qualified) void, or an array of unknown bound, the behavior is undefined.
If an instantiation of a template above depends, directly or indirectly, on an incomplete type, and that instantiation could yield a different result if that type were hypothetically completed, the behavior is undefined.
If the program adds specializations for any of the templates described on this page, the behavior is undefined.
[edit] Helper variable templates template< class T >inline constexpr bool is_copy_constructible_v =
inline constexpr bool is_trivially_copy_constructible_v =
inline constexpr bool is_nothrow_copy_constructible_v =
T
is copy-constructible, false otherwise
In many implementations, is_nothrow_copy_constructible
also checks if the destructor throws because it is effectively noexcept(T(arg)). Same applies to is_trivially_copy_constructible
, which, in these implementations, also requires that the destructor is trivial: GCC bug 51452, LWG issue 2116.
#include <string> #include <type_traits> struct S1 { std::string str; // member has a non-trivial copy constructor }; static_assert(std::is_copy_constructible_v<S1>); static_assert(!std::is_trivially_copy_constructible_v<S1>); struct S2 { int n; S2(const S2&) = default; // trivial and non-throwing }; static_assert(std::is_trivially_copy_constructible_v<S2>); static_assert(std::is_nothrow_copy_constructible_v<S2>); struct S3 { S3(const S3&) = delete; // explicitly deleted }; static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<S3>); struct S4 { S4(S4&) {}; // cannot bind const, hence not a copy-constructible }; static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<S4>); int main() {}[edit] Defect reports
The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.
DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior LWG 2196 C++11 the behavior was unclear if const T& cannot be formed the value produced is false in this case [edit] See alsoRetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4