Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-814399 below:

Thieme E-Journals - Endoscopy / Abstract

Endoscopy 2004; 36(6): 499-503
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814399

Original Article

• ¹Dept. of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
• ²Dept. of Gastroenterology, Colorectal Unit, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

Further Information

Submitted 23 April 2003

Accepted after Revision 19 December 2003

Publication Date:

Background and Study Aims: Colonoscopy can produce false-negative results, and the reasons for this remain obscure. The aim of this study was to examine why cancers are missed at colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: All colonoscopies carried out at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand, over a 43-month period (1 October 1997 - 30 April 2001) were retrospectively analyzed (the data having been prospectively collected). All cases of colorectal carcinoma during the period 1 October 1997 - 30 July 2001 (3 months longer, to capture delayed diagnoses) were also identified. The two databases were then compared, and all cases in which a colonoscopy had been performed more than 6 weeks before a colorectal carcinoma specimen being received by the pathology department were identified and analyzed. Results: A total of 5055 colonoscopies were undertaken in 4598 patients. Over this period, 630 colorectal carcinomas were identified in the pathology database; 286 of the patients affected were in the colonoscopy and pathology database. Sixty-six patients had had a colonoscopy performed more than 6 weeks before the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma. Carcinoma was identified in 48 of these 66 patients, and management was being provided. Seventeen cancers (5.9 %) were missed at colonoscopy, and the patients had had an incomplete colonoscopy in nine of these cases. In seven of the 17, an alternative benign cause was recorded. In four patients, a lesion was seen and thought to be benign, although subsequently proven not to be. In another four cases, the cancer was not diagnosed despite adequate bowel preparation and what was thought by the colonoscopist to be an adequate colonoscopy. Conclusions: Colonoscopy missed 17 of 286 cancers (5.9 %). The reasons why cancers were missed relate to incomplete colonoscopy, poor bowel preparation, misinterpretation of what was seen, failure to carry out adequate biopsy (and follow-up) of lesions seen, and systems failures related to follow-up investigations in patients who had an incomplete colonoscopy. The fact that colonoscopy and barium enema investigations may fail to diagnose cancers has important medicolegal implications. The recognition that colonoscopy may miss a cancer should encourage doctors to reinvestigate patients when there is a lack of correlation between the clinical and investigative findings.

• 1 New Zealand Health Information Service .Cancer: new registrations and deaths 1997. Wellington, New Zealand; Ministry of Health 2001: (available at http://www.nzhis.govt.nz/publications/cancer97.pdf)
• 2 Wilmink A BM. Overview of the epidemiology of colorectal cancer.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 483-493
• 3 Anderson N, Cook H B, Coates R. Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema.  Gastrointestinal Radiol. 1991;  16 123-127
• 4 Mendelson R M. The role of the barium enema in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.  Australas Radiol. 1998;  42 191-196
• 5 Brady A P, Stevenson G W, Stevenson I. Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination: a continuing perceptual problem.  Radiology. 1994;  192 373-378
• 6 Foster D R. Audit of barium enema examinations in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.  Australas Radiol. 1998;  42 197-198
• 7 Storm E, Larsen J L. Colon cancer at barium enema examination and colonoscopy from the country of Hordaland, Norway.  Radiology. 1999;  211 211-214
• 8 Thomas R D, Firhurst J J, Frost R A. Wessex regional radiology audit: barium enema in colorectal cancer.  Clin Radiol. 1995;  50 647-650
• 9 Winawer S J, Stewart E T, Zauber A G. et al . A comparison of colonoscopy and double contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1766-1772
• 10 Fletcher R H. The end of barium enemas [editorial].  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1823-1824
• 11 Rex D K, Rahmani E Y, Haseman J H. et al . Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 17-23
• 12 McDonald S, Lyall P, Israel L. et al . Why barium enemas fail to identify colorectal cancer.  ANZ J Surg. 2001;  71 631-633
• 13 Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T. et al . Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back to-back colonoscopies.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 24-28
• 14 Gilliland R, Williamson K E, Wilson R H. et al . Colorectal cell kinetics.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 739-749
• 15 Haseman J H, Lemmel G T, Rahmani E Y, Rex D K. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal carcinoma: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 451-455
• 16 Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y. et al . Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after colonoscopy negative for cancer.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 506-510
• 17 Gorski T F, Rosen L, Riether R. et al . Colorectal cancer after surveillance colonoscopy: false-negative examination or fast growth?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 877-880
• 18 Britton I, Dover S, Vallance R. Immediate CT pneumocolon for failed colonoscopy: comparison with routine pneumocolon.  Clin Radiol. 2001;  56 89-93
• 19 Fenlon H M, Nunes D P, Schroy P C. et al . A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  341 1496-1503
• 20 Harvey C J, Renfrew I, Taylor S. et al . Spiral CT pneumocolon: applications, status and limitations.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 1612-1625
• 21 Cirocco W C, Rusin L C. Confirmation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 402-406
• 22 Miller B J, Cohen J R, Theile D E. et al . Diagnostic failure in colonoscopies for malignant disease.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1998;  68 331-333
• 23 Adam I J, Ali Z, Shorthouse A J. Inadequacy of colonoscopy revealed by three-dimensional electromagnetic imaging.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 978-983
• 24 Külling D, Christ A D, Karaaslan N. et al . Is histological investigation of polyps always necessary?.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 454-457
• 25 Treeca A, Fujii T, Kato S. et al . Small advanced colorectal adenocarcinomas: report on three cases.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 493-495
• 26 Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions of the colon.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1001-1006
• 27 Hixson L J, Fennerty M B, Sampliner R E, Garewal H S. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 125-127
• 28 Van Dam J V, Friedman L S. Missed cancers at colonoscopy: learning the hard way.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 530-532

F. A. Frizelle, M. D.

Colorectal Unit, Dept. of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital

Riccarton Avenue · Christchurch · New Zealand

Fax: +64-3-3640-352

Email: frank.frizelle@chmeds.ac.nz

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3