Nature volume 163, pages 676–677 (1949)Cite this article
3602 Accesses
910 Citations
31 Altmetric
GENETICISTS have long emphasized that 'maleness' and 'femaleness', so far as chromosome content is concerned, are projected from the fertilized ovum into the morphologically and functionally specialized somatic cells. It appears not to be generally known, however, that the sex of a somatic cell as highly differentiated as a neurone may be detected with no more elaborate equipment than a compound microscope following staining of the tissue by the routine Nissl method.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access optionsSubscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
199,00 € per year
only 3,90 € per issue
Buy this article
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options: Similar content being viewed by others ReferencesGates, R. R., Bot. Rev., 8, 387 (1942).
Caspersson, T., and Schultz, J., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 26, 507 (1940).
Hydén, H., Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1, 152 (1947).
Department of Anatomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
MURRAY L. BARR & EWART G. BERTRAM
BARR, M., BERTRAM, E. A Morphological Distinction between Neurones of the Male and Female, and the Behaviour of the Nucleolar Satellite during Accelerated Nucleoprotein Synthesis. Nature 163, 676–677 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163676a0
Issue Date: 30 April 1949
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163676a0
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4