Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01257-y below:

Understanding Perceptions of Radical and Liberal Feminists: The Nuanced Roles of Warmth and Competence

• Acker, S. (1987). Feminist theory and the study of gender and education. International Review of Education, 33, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615157

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Adichie, C. N. (2015). We should all be feminists. Anchor Books.

• Amos, V., & Parmar, P. (2001). Challenging imperial feminism. In K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism & Race (pp. 17–32). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anastosopoulos, V., & Desmarais, S. (2015). By name or by deed? Identifying the source of the feminist stigma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(4), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12290

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, V. N. (2009). What’s in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01490.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baumgardner, J., & Richards, A. (2000). Manifesta: Young women, feminism, and the future. Macmillan Publishers.

• Casad, B. J., Salazar, M. M., & Macina, V. (2015). The real versus the ideal: Predicting relationship satisfaction and well-being from endorsement of marriage myths and benevolent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314528304

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Charter, M. L. (2021). Exploring the importance of feminist identity in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 41(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2021.1895404

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheryan, S., & Markus, H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209

• Cole, S. G. (2019). The phoenix rises: What radical feminist Andrea Dworkin can teach us today. Herizons, 33(3), 22. http://www.herizons.ca/node/729

• Conlin, S. E., & Heesacker, M. (2018). Feminist men? Examining men’s feminist self-identification, activism and the impact of language. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(8), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1371007

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 40. (pp. 61–149). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.

• Donovan, J. (1985). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions of American feminism. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

• Donovan, J. (2000). Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

• Douglas, S. J. (1995). Where the girls are: Growing up female with the mass media. Three Rivers Press.

• Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20(3), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00159

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494

• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Erlbaum Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00432.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenstein, H. (1984). Contemporary feminist thought. Unwin.

• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Firestone, S. (1971). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. Bantam Books.

• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D’Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., ... Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ging, D., & Siapera, E. (Eds). (2019). Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gundersen, A. B., & Kunst, J. R. (2019). Feminist ≠ feminine? Feminist women are visually masculinized whereas feminist men are feminized. Sex Roles, 80(5–6), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0931-7

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Halper, L., Cowgill, C., & Rios, K. (2019). Gender bias in caregiving professions: The role of perceived warmth. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(9), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12615

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Woman and revolution (pp. 1–41). South End Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hartsock, N. (1989). Postmodernism and political change: Issues for feminist theory. In N. Hartsock, D. Przybylowicz, & P. McCallum (Eds.), Cultural critique (pp. 15–33). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

• Helweg-Larsen, M., & LoMonaco, B. L. (2008). Queuing among U2 fans: Reactions to social norm violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(9), 2378–2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00396.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O’Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hooks, B. (2001). Black women: Shaping feminist theory. In K. Bhavnani (Ed.), Feminism & race (pp. 17–32). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hopkins-Doyle, A., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., & Calogero, R. M. (2019). Flattering to deceive: Why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000135

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Jordan-Zachery, J. S., & Harris, D. (2019). We are magic and we are real: Exploring the politics of Black femmes, girls, and women’s self-articulation. In J. S. Jordan-Zachery & D. Harris (Eds.), Black girl magic: Beyond the hashtag (pp. 3–40). University of Arizona Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Kam, C. C. S., & Bond, M. H. (2009). Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X324367

  Article  Google Scholar 

• King, E. B., Botsford, W., Hebl, M. R., Kazama, S., Dawson, J. F., & Perkins, A. (2012). Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1835–1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365902

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative–progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 675–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000046

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Koedt, A., Levine, E., & Rapone, A. (Eds.) (1971). Politics of ego: A manifesto for New York radical feminists. Quadrangle Books.

• Limbaugh, R. H. (1993). The way things ought to be. Pocket Star Books.

• Lindsey, L. L. (2014). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Pearson Education.

• Liss, M., Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2004). Predictors and correlates of collective action. Sex Roles, 50(11), 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029096.90835.3f

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2010). Everyone feels empowered: Understanding feminist self-labelling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01544.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McRobbie, A. (2008). The aftermath of feminism. SAGE Publication.

• Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9523-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, J., Liss, M., Erchull, M., Hurt, M., Ramsey, L., Turner, D., & Haines, M. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 58, 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ohbuchi, K.-I., Tamura, T., Quigley, B. M., Tedeschi, J. T., Madi, N., Bond, M. H., & Mummendey, A. (2004). Anger, blame, and dimensions of perceived norm violations: Culture, gender, and relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(8), 1587–1603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02788.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Radke, H. R. M., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71(9), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040345

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rowe, A. M. C. (2000). Locating feminism’s subject: The paradox of white femininity and the struggle to forge feminist alliances. Communication Theory, 20(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00179.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rudman, L. A., Mescher, K., & Moss-Racusin, C. A. (2013). Reactions to gender egalitarian men: Perceived feminization due to stigma-by-association. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461160

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167–227). Academic Press.

• Saunders, K., & Kashubeck-West, S. (2006). The relations among feminist identity, gender role orientation, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00282.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siegel, J. A., & Calogero, R. M. (2021). Measurement of feminist identity and attitudes over the past half century: A critical review and call for further research. Sex Roles, 85, 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01219-w

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schueller, M. J. (2005). Analogy and (White) feminist theory: Thinking race and the color of the cyborg body. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(1), 63–92.

• Shepherd, M., Erchull, M. J., Rosner, A., Taubenberger, L., Queen, E. F., & McKee, J. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shibles, W. (1989). Radical feminism, humanism and women’s studies. Innovative High Education, 14, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889761

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stamkou, E., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). How norm violations shape social hierarchies: Those who stand on top block norm violators from rising up. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 608–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1368430216641305

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Strinić, A., Carlsson, M., & Agerström, J. (2021). Occupational stereotypes: Professionals´ warmth and competence perceptions of occupations. Personnel Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0458

• Swirsky, J. M., & Angelone, D. J. (2014). Femi-Nazis and bra burning crazies: A qualitative evaluation of contemporary beliefs about feminism. Current Psychology, 33, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9208-7

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x

• Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Warren, M. (1980). The nature of woman: An encyclopedia & guide to the literature. Edgepress.

• Willis, E. (1984). Radical feminism and feminist radicalism. Social Text, 9(10), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/466537

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, J. (1980). Love, sex and feminism. Praeger.

  Google Scholar 

• Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, M. (1987). Feminism, deep ecology and environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 9(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19879112

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but ….” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1895–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4