In February 2005, unexpected heavy snowstorms lasted a couple of days with changing intensities, producing significant snowfall that eventually paralyzed the life of Istanbul metropolis. Surprisingly, there was no caution announcement prior to the onset of this unusual weather phenomenon. What was the reason behind this wrong prediction? In this case study, using a meteorological model, a heavy sea-effect snowfall, the reason of this phenomenon, was simulated and researched. With a persistent surface high-pressure center over western Russia, a surface low-pressure positioned in the center of southern Turkey was the dominant feature of the formation of the sea-effect snow over the city. In addition to strong northerly winds (19 m/s), low directional vertical wind shear (<30o) and extremely long fetch distance (~600 km) feature; environmental conditions during the event were characterized by a sea-surface 850-hPa temperature difference of up to 14°C and a sea–land temperature difference as high as 24°C.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article Subscribe and saveSpringer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
Price includes VAT (Germany)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others Explore related subjectsDiscover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning. ReferencesBallentine RJ (1982) Numerical simulation of land-breeze-induced snowbands along the western shore of Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 110:1544–1553
Ballentine RJ, Stamm AJ, Chermack EE, Byrd GP, Schleede D (1998) Mesoscale model simulation of the 4–5 January 1995 lake-effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 13:892–920
Braham RR Jr (1983) The midwest snow storm of 8–11 December 1977. Mon Wea Rev 111:253–272
Carpenter DM (1993) The lake effect of the Great Salt Lake: overview and forecast problems. Wea Forecast 8:181–193
Cooper KA, Hjelmfelt MR, Kristovich DAR, Derickson RG, Laird NF (2000) Numerical simulations of an observed lake effect snow storm with transitions between linear and cellular convective structures. Mon Wea Rev 128:3283–3295
Douglas MW, Stensrud DJ (1996) Upgrading the North American upper-air observing network: what are the possibilities? Bull Amer Meteor Soc 77:907–924
Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107
Ezber Y, Sen OL, Kindap T, Karaca M (2007) Climatic effects of urbanization in Istanbul: a statistical and modeling analysis. Int J Climatol 27:667–679
Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth-generation penn state/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). National center for atmospheric research, Boulder, CO, NCAR/TN-389+STR
Gustafsson N, Kallen E, Thorsteinsson S (1998) Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial and lateral boundary conditions. Tellus 50A:167–185
Hjelmfelt MR (1990) Numerical study of the influence of environmental conditions on lake-effect snowstorms on Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 118:138–150
Hjelmfelt MR (1992) Orographic effects in simulated lake-effect snowstorms over Lake Michigan. Mon Wea Rev 120:373–377
Hjelmfelt MR, Braham RR Jr (1983) Numerical simulation of the airflow over Lake Michigan for a major lake-effect snow event. Mon Wea Rev 111:205–219
Holyroyd EW III (1971) Lake effect cloud bands as seen from weather satellites. J Atmos Sci 28:1165–1170
Hong SY, Pan HL (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium range forecast model. Mon Wea Rev 124:2322–2339
Jiusto JE, Kaplan ML (1972) Snowfall from lake-effect storms. Mon Wea Rev 100:62–66
Kain JS (2004) The kain-fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteor 43:170–181
Kindap T (2008) Identifying the trans-boundary transport of air pollutants to the city of Istanbul under specific weather conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:279–289
Kindap T, Unal A, Chen S-H, Hu Y, Odman MT, Karaca M (2006) Long-range aerosol transport from Europe to Istanbul, Turkey. Atmos Environ 40:3536–3547
Kristovich DAR, Laird NF, Hjelmfelt MR (2002) Convective evolution across Lake Michigan during a widespread lake-effect snow event. Mon Wea Rev 131:643–655
Lavoie RL (1972) A mesoscale numerical model of lake-effect storms. J Atmos Sci 29:1025–1040
Lin YL, Smith RB (1986) Transient dynamics of airflow near a local heat source. J Atmos Sci 43:40–49
Miner TJ, Fritsch JM (1997) Lake-effect rain events. Mon Wea Rev 125:3231–3248
Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102:16663–16682
Niziol TA (1987) Operational forecasting of lake-effect snowfall in western and central New York. Wea Forecast 2:310–321
Niziol TA, Snyder WR, Waldstreicher JS (1995) Winter weather forecasting throughout the eastern United States. Part IV: lake effect snow. Wea Forecast 10:61–77
Onton DJ, Steenburgh WJ (2001) Diagnostic and sensitivity studies of the 7 December 1998 Great Salt Lake–effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 129:1273–1293
Passarelli RE, Braham RR Jr (1981) The role of the winter land breeze in the formation of Great Lakes snowstorms. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 62:482–491
Peace RL, Sykes RB Jr (1966) Mesoscale study of a lake effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 94:495–507
Rabier F, Clinker E, Courtier P, Hollingsworth A (1996) Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122:121–150
Rothrock HJ (1969) An aid in forecasting significant lake snows. ESSA Tech Memo. WBTM CR-30, p 11 (Available from national weather service central region, Room 1836, 601 E. 12th St., Kansas City, MO 64106-2897)
Scott CPJ, Sousounis PJ (2001) The utility of additional soundings for forecasting lake-effect snow in the great lakes region. Weather Forecast 16(4):448–462
Sousounis PJ, Mann GE, Young GSR, Wagenmaker B, Hoggatt BD, Badini WJ (1999) Forecasting during the lake-ICE/SNOWBANDS field experiments. Wea Forecast 14:955–975
Steenburgh WJ, Onton DJ (2000) Multiscale analysis of the 7 December 1998 great salt lake-effect snowstorm. Mon Wea Rev 129:1296–1313
Steenburgh WJ, Halvorson SF, Onton DJ (2000) Climatology of lake-effect snowstorms of the Great Salt Lake. Mon Wea Rev 128:709–727
Warner TT, Key LE, Lario AM (1989) Sensitivity of mesoscale-model forecast skill to some initial-data characteristics, data density, data position, analysis procedure and measurement error. Mon Wea Rev 117:1281–1310
Wiggin BL (1950) Great snows of the great lakes. Weatherwise 3:123–126
This study has been supported by a research grant (11_05_268) provided by the Secretaria of Research Activities at Istanbul Technical University and by a research grant (105Y046) provided by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). The modeling experiments were carried out at the computing facilities of the Institute of Informatics at Istanbul Technical University. Thanks to M. Ersen Aksoy (EIES) for the technical assistance. I appreciate the editorial assistance provided by Ayce Aksay.
Author information Authors and AffiliationsEurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Ayazaga Campus, 34469, Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
Tayfun Kindap
Correspondence to Tayfun Kindap.
About this article Cite this articleKindap, T. A severe sea-effect snow episode over the city of Istanbul. Nat Hazards 54, 707–723 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9496-7
Received: 09 June 2008
Accepted: 24 December 2009
Published: 19 January 2010
Issue Date: September 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9496-7
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4