A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing/ below:

Form handling with class-based views | Django documentation

Form handling with class-based views

Form processing generally has 3 paths:

Implementing this yourself often results in a lot of repeated boilerplate code (see Using a form in a view). To help avoid this, Django provides a collection of generic class-based views for form processing.

Basic forms

Given a contact form:

from django import forms


class ContactForm(forms.Form):
    name = forms.CharField()
    message = forms.CharField(widget=forms.Textarea)

    def send_email(self):
        # send email using the self.cleaned_data dictionary
        pass

The view can be constructed using a FormView:

from myapp.forms import ContactForm
from django.views.generic.edit import FormView


class ContactFormView(FormView):
    template_name = "contact.html"
    form_class = ContactForm
    success_url = "/thanks/"

    def form_valid(self, form):
        # This method is called when valid form data has been POSTed.
        # It should return an HttpResponse.
        form.send_email()
        return super().form_valid(form)

Notes:

Model forms

Generic views really shine when working with models. These generic views will automatically create a ModelForm, so long as they can work out which model class to use:

Model form views provide a form_valid() implementation that saves the model automatically. You can override this if you have any special requirements; see below for examples.

You don’t even need to provide a success_url for CreateView or UpdateView - they will use get_absolute_url() on the model object if available.

If you want to use a custom ModelForm (for instance to add extra validation), set form_class on your view.

Note

When specifying a custom form class, you must still specify the model, even though the form_class may be a ModelForm.

First we need to add get_absolute_url() to our Author class:

from django.db import models
from django.urls import reverse


class Author(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=200)

    def get_absolute_url(self):
        return reverse("author-detail", kwargs={"pk": self.pk})

Then we can use CreateView and friends to do the actual work. Notice how we’re just configuring the generic class-based views here; we don’t have to write any logic ourselves:

from django.urls import reverse_lazy
from django.views.generic.edit import CreateView, DeleteView, UpdateView
from myapp.models import Author


class AuthorCreateView(CreateView):
    model = Author
    fields = ["name"]


class AuthorUpdateView(UpdateView):
    model = Author
    fields = ["name"]


class AuthorDeleteView(DeleteView):
    model = Author
    success_url = reverse_lazy("author-list")

Note

We have to use reverse_lazy() instead of reverse(), as the urls are not loaded when the file is imported.

The fields attribute works the same way as the fields attribute on the inner Meta class on ModelForm. Unless you define the form class in another way, the attribute is required and the view will raise an ImproperlyConfigured exception if it’s not.

If you specify both the fields and form_class attributes, an ImproperlyConfigured exception will be raised.

Finally, we hook these new views into the URLconf:

from django.urls import path
from myapp.views import AuthorCreateView, AuthorDeleteView, AuthorUpdateView

urlpatterns = [
    # ...
    path("author/add/", AuthorCreateView.as_view(), name="author-add"),
    path("author/<int:pk>/", AuthorUpdateView.as_view(), name="author-update"),
    path("author/<int:pk>/delete/", AuthorDeleteView.as_view(), name="author-delete"),
]
Models and request.user

To track the user that created an object using a CreateView, you can use a custom ModelForm to do this. First, add the foreign key relation to the model:

from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.db import models


class Author(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
    created_by = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)

    # ...

In the view, ensure that you don’t include created_by in the list of fields to edit, and override form_valid() to add the user:

from django.contrib.auth.mixins import LoginRequiredMixin
from django.views.generic.edit import CreateView
from myapp.models import Author


class AuthorCreateView(LoginRequiredMixin, CreateView):
    model = Author
    fields = ["name"]

    def form_valid(self, form):
        form.instance.created_by = self.request.user
        return super().form_valid(form)

LoginRequiredMixin prevents users who aren’t logged in from accessing the form. If you omit that, you’ll need to handle unauthorized users in form_valid().

Content negotiation example

Here is an example showing how you might go about implementing a form that works with an API-based workflow as well as ‘normal’ form POSTs:

from django.http import JsonResponse
from django.views.generic.edit import CreateView
from myapp.models import Author


class JsonableResponseMixin:
    """
    Mixin to add JSON support to a form.
    Must be used with an object-based FormView (e.g. CreateView)
    """

    def form_invalid(self, form):
        response = super().form_invalid(form)
        if self.request.accepts("text/html"):
            return response
        else:
            return JsonResponse(form.errors, status=400)

    def form_valid(self, form):
        # We make sure to call the parent's form_valid() method because
        # it might do some processing (in the case of CreateView, it will
        # call form.save() for example).
        response = super().form_valid(form)
        if self.request.accepts("text/html"):
            return response
        else:
            data = {
                "pk": self.object.pk,
            }
            return JsonResponse(data)


class AuthorCreateView(JsonableResponseMixin, CreateView):
    model = Author
    fields = ["name"]

The above example assumes that if the client supports text/html, that they would prefer it. However, this may not always be true. When requesting a .css file, many browsers will send the header Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1, indicating that they would prefer CSS, but anything else is fine. This means request.accepts("text/html") will be True.

To determine the correct format, taking into consideration the client’s preference, use django.http.HttpRequest.get_preferred_type():

class JsonableResponseMixin:
    """
    Mixin to add JSON support to a form.
    Must be used with an object-based FormView (e.g. CreateView).
    """

    accepted_media_types = ["text/html", "application/json"]

    def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        if request.get_preferred_type(self.accepted_media_types) is None:
            # No format in common.
            return HttpResponse(
                status_code=406, headers={"Accept": ",".join(self.accepted_media_types)}
            )

        return super().dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)

    def form_invalid(self, form):
        response = super().form_invalid(form)
        accepted_type = self.request.get_preferred_type(self.accepted_media_types)
        if accepted_type == "text/html":
            return response
        elif accepted_type == "application/json":
            return JsonResponse(form.errors, status=400)

    def form_valid(self, form):
        # We make sure to call the parent's form_valid() method because
        # it might do some processing (in the case of CreateView, it will
        # call form.save() for example).
        response = super().form_valid(form)
        accepted_type = self.request.get_preferred_type(self.accepted_media_types)
        if accepted_type == "text/html":
            return response
        elif accepted_type == "application/json":
            data = {
                "pk": self.object.pk,
            }
            return JsonResponse(data)

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4