Given the following:
<p>
<label
>Enter your phone number in the format (123)456-7890 (<input
name="tel1"
type="tel"
pattern="[0-9]{3}"
placeholder="###"
aria-label="3-digit area code"
size="2" />)-
<input
name="tel2"
type="tel"
pattern="[0-9]{3}"
placeholder="###"
aria-label="3-digit prefix"
size="2" />
-
<input
name="tel3"
type="tel"
pattern="[0-9]{4}"
placeholder="####"
aria-label="4-digit number"
size="3" />
</label>
</p>
Here we have 3 sections for a North American phone number with an implicit label encompassing all three components of the phone number, expecting 3-digits, 3-digits and 4-digits respectively, as defined by the pattern
attribute set on each.
If the values are too long or too short, or contain characters that aren't digits, patternMismatch
will be true. When true
, the element matches the :invalid
CSS pseudo-classes.
input:invalid {
border: red solid 3px;
}
Note, in this case, we get a patternMismatch
not a validityState.tooLong
or validityState.tooShort
if the values are too long or too short because it is the pattern that is dictating the length of the value. Had we used minlength
and maxlength
attributes instead, we may have seen validityState.tooLong
or validityState.tooShort
being true.
Note: The email
input type requires, at minimum, a match of x@y
and the url
type requires, at minimum, a match to x:, with no pattern attribute present. When invalid, the validityState.typeMismatch
will be true, if there is no pattern attribute (or if the pattern attribute is not valid for that input type).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4