Sentinel has a built-in test framework to validate a policy behaves as expected.
With an ever-increasing amount of automation surrounding technology, the guardrails provided by policies are a critical piece towards ensuring expected behavior. As a reliance on correct policy increases, it is important to test and verify policies.
Testing is a necessary step to fully realize policy as code. Just as good software is well tested, a good set of policies should be equally well tested.
Policies are tested by asserting that rules are the expected values given a pre-configured input. Tests are run by executing the test command.
Sentinel is opinionated about the folder structure required for tests. This opinionated structure allows testing to be as simple as running sentinel test with no arguments. Additionally, it becomes simple to test in a CI or add new policies.
The structure Sentinel expects is test/<policy>/*.[hcl|json] where <policy> is the name of your policy file without the file extension. Within that folder is a list of HCL or JSON files. Each file represents a single test case. Therefore, each policy can have multiple tests associated with it.
Note that the primary configuration file format for Sentinel is HCL. While you can write configuration files in a HCL-equivalent JSON, we only discuss the use of HCL on this page.
Each HCL file within the test folder for a policy is a single test case.
The file is the same configuration format as the CLI configuration file. The format lets you define mock data, imports to use, and more. This mock data is the key piece in being able to test policies: you craft a specific scenario and assert your policy behaves as you expect.
Test cases also use the test block within the configuration file to assert the value of rules. If the test key is omitted, the policy is expected to pass. If the test key is specified, only the rules specified in the map will be asserted. This means if you omit main, then the final policy result is not asserted.
Example with assertions:
param "day" {
value = "monday"
}
param "hour" {
value = 7
}
test {
rules = {
main = false
is_open_hours = false
is_weekday = true
}
}
The configuration above specifies some parameter data, and asserts the result of some rules. This is the same configuration used in the example section below.
Lets use the following file as an example. Save this file to a directory and name it policy.sentinel. It can be named anything with the sentinel extension, but by naming it policy.sentinel your output should match the example output on this page.
// The day of the week.
param day
// The hour of the day.
param hour
is_weekday = rule { day not in ["saturday", "sunday"] }
is_open_hours = rule { hour > 8 and hour < 17 }
main = rule { is_open_hours and is_weekday }
Next, let's define a single test case. Relative to where you saved the policy, create a file at the path test/policy/good.hcl.
param "day" {
value = "monday"
}
param "hour" {
value = 14
}
Now run sentinel test:
$ sentinel test
PASS - policy.sentinel
PASS - test/policy/good.hcl
This passed because the policy passed. We didn't assert any specific rules. By not specifying any assertions, test expects the policy itself to fully pass.
Define another test case to fail. We want to verify our policy fails when expected, too.
Save the following as test/policy/7-am.hcl:
param "day" {
value = "monday"
}
param "hour" {
value = 7
}
Now run sentinel test:
$ sentinel test
FAIL - policy.sentinel
FAIL - test/policy/7-am.hcl
expected "main" to be true, got: false
trace:
policy.sentinel:9:1 - Rule "main"
bool: false
policy.sentinel:8:1 - Rule "is_open_hours"
bool: false
PASS - test/policy/good.hcl
As you can see, the test fails because "main" is false. This is good because the policy should have failed since we specified an invalid hour. But, we expect main to be false and don't want our test to fail! Update 7-am.hcl to add test assertions:
param "day" {
value = "monday"
}
param "hour" {
value = 7
}
test {
rules = {
main = false
is_open_hours = false
}
}
And when we run the tests:
$ sentinel test
PASS - policy.sentinel
PASS - test/policy/7-am.hcl
PASS - test/policy/good.hcl
The test passes. We asserted that we expect the main rule to be false, the is_open_hours rule to be false, and the is_weekday rule to be true. By asserting some rules are true, we can verify that our policy is failing for reasons we expect.
The above example demonstrates how to test by supplying different parameters. Parameters in a policy can be specifically useful when you want to control user-defined input values to a policy.
However, generally, when testing, you will need mimic the conditions you will see in production. Production implementations of Sentinel will supply data using one of two methods:
Proper testing of a policy requires that these values be able to be mocked - or, in other words, simulated in a way that allows the accurate testing of the scenarios that a policy could reasonably pass or fail under.
Mocking both globals and imports can be done by setting various parts of the configuration file.
Mocking GlobalsDemonstrating the mocking of globals can be seen by making a few modifications to our example policy, removing the param declarations:
is_weekday = rule { day not in ["saturday", "sunday"] }
is_open_hours = rule { hour > 8 and hour < 17 }
main = rule { is_open_hours and is_weekday }
Then, change the param section in the configuration file to global.
global "day" {
value = "monday"
}
global "hour" {
value = 14
}
This test should still pass, as if nothing had happened, although what we've done is shifted our parameters to globals, simulating an environment where day and hour are already defined for us.
To mock imports, we need to use the mock section of the configuration file.
Let's say the above example is behind an import named time.
NOTE: time is a valid standard import. This example may not be accurate to the import's syntax.
The code now looks like this:
import "time"
is_weekday = rule { time.now.weekday_name not in ["Saturday", "Sunday"] }
is_open_hours = rule { time.now.hour > 8 and time.now.hour < 17 }
main = rule { is_open_hours and is_weekday }
To mock this import, we can mock it as static data. The configuration file now looks like, without assertions:
mock "time" {
data = {
now = {
weekday_name = "Monday"
hour = 14
}
}
}
The policy will now pass, with the time import mocked.
Data can also be mocked as Sentinel code. In this case, the above configuration file would look like:
mock "time" {
module {
source = "mock-time.sentinel"
}
}
And a file named mock-time.sentinel would now hold your mock values:
Mocking as Sentinel code allows more complex details to be mocked as well, such as functions. Say we wanted to mock the time.load() function. To mock this, just add it to the mock-time.sentinel file:
load = func(_) {
return {
"weekday_name": "Monday",
"hour": 14,
}
}
Your code can now be written as:
import "time"
t = time.load("a_mock_timestamp")
is_weekday = rule { t.weekday_name not in ["Saturday", "Sunday"] }
is_open_hours = rule { t.hour > 8 and t.hour < 17 }
main = rule { is_open_hours and is_weekday }
To see more details, see the Mock Imports section in the configuration file.
Non-boolean rules can also be asserted by sentinel test.
To assert non-boolean values, simply enter the expected value into the rule contents:
param "maintenance_days" {
value = [
{
day = "wednesday"
hour = 9
},
{
day = "friday"
hour = 1
},
{
day = "sunday"
hour = 1
},
]
}
test {
rules = {
main = [
{
day = "wednesday"
hour = 9
},
]
}
}
This would assert a policy checking for violations of a maintenance policy, saying that maintenance hours should happen before 6AM on any given day:
param maintenance_days
main = rule {
filter maintenance_days as d {
d.hour >= 6
}
}
Running sentinel test with the -json flag will give you the test results in a JSON output format, suitable for parsing by reporting software.
Note: The JSON output format is currently under development and the format may change at a later time. Additionally, support for other well-known formats, such as JUnit, may become available in the future.
The current format is an object with the top-level keys being policies and duration, with each test grouped up by policy being run. duration represents time taken in milliseconds for all policies to run.
The policy result fields are:
path: The path of the policy and the index of the test result in the policies field in the root object.status: A string representation of the policy's test status as a whole. Can be one of PASS, FAIL, ERROR, or ?. The final status, ?, represents a policy that has no tests to process, and acts like a passing test.errors: An array of any error messages encountered during processing the policy for testing. Usually reserved for policy file or parser-related errors. For case-specific errors, see the error field for the particular case.cases: A map of case results, indexed by case path.duration: Time taken in milliseconds for the policy to run.The case result fields are:
path: The path of the test case and the result's index in the cases field in the policy object.status: A string representation of the case's test status. Can be one of PASS, FAIL or ERROR.errors: An array of any error messages encountered during running this test case.trace: The trace for this policy in JSON format. See the tracing page for more details.rule_detail: When the status of this test case is FAIL, contains an object of assertion failure detail, indexed by rule. Only failures are counted here; any rules not found here can be assumed to have passed or not asserted.config_warnings: An array of strings denoting any configuration warnings found while processing the configuration for this test case.config_legacy: Denotes whether or not the configuration is a legacy JSON configuration and needs to be modernized. This field may be removed in future releases.A passing example is shown below:
{
"policies": {
"policy.sentinel": {
"path": "policy.sentinel",
"status": "PASS",
"errors": null,
"duration": 5,
"cases": {
"test/policy/pass.hcl": {
"path": "test/policy/pass.hcl",
"status": "PASS",
"errors": null,
"trace": {
"description": "A very basic policy to determine if a run is within working hours.",
"error": null,
"print": "",
"result": true,
"rules": {
"is_open_hours": {
"desc": "Passes if run during business hours.",
"ident": "is_open_hours",
"position": {
"filename": "policy.sentinel",
"offset": 290,
"line": 13,
"column": 1
},
"value": true
},
"is_weekday": {
"desc": "Passes if the day does not fall on the weekend.",
"ident": "is_weekday",
"position": {
"filename": "policy.sentinel",
"offset": 193,
"line": 10,
"column": 1
},
"value": true
},
"main": {
"desc": "",
"ident": "main",
"position": {
"filename": "policy.sentinel",
"offset": 338,
"line": 14,
"column": 1
},
"value": true
}
}
},
"rule_detail": {},
"config_warnings": null,
"config_legacy": false
}
}
}
},
"duration": 10
}
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4