This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
903.back_insert_iterator
issue
Section: 24.5.2.2 [back.insert.iterator] Status: NAD Submitter: Dave Abrahams Opened: 2008-09-19 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [back.insert.iterator].
View all issues with NAD status.
Discussion:
I just noticed this; don't know how far the problem(?) extends or whether it's new or existing: back_insert_iterator
's operator*
is not const
, so you can't dereference a const
one.
[ Post Summit Daniel adds: ]
If done, this change should be applied for
front_insert_iterator
,insert_iterator
,ostream_iterator
, andostreambuf_iterator
as well.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
Alisdair notes that these all are output iterators. Howard points out that
++*i
would no longer work if we made this change.Move to NAD.
[ 2009-05-25 Daniel adds: ]
OutputIterator
does no longer support post increment.operator*
can be added. Note that the HasDereference
concept (and the HasDereference
part of concept Iterator
) was specifically refactored to cope with optional const qualification and to properly reflect the dual nature of built-in operator*
as of 12.6 [over.literal]/6.Proposed resolution:
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4