Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/impls below:

RDFCore Implementation Report, Prosed Recommendation request

Dear W3C Director,

WhereAs

• you chartered the RDFCore Working Group to:
  • fix, clarify and improve the specification of RDF's abstract model and XML syntax
  • to complete the work on RDF vocabulary description
  • provide an account of the relationships between the basic components of RDF (Model, Syntax, Schema) and the larger XML family of recommendations.
• we have developed specification, test materials, and supplementary documentation for RDF
• this specification and other materials have received wide review, and we have addressed the issues raised in the working group and a substantial surrounding community
• we have implementation experience to validate the design

The RDFCore Working Group decided ( 2003-11-07 meeting record in progress) to request that you advance this specification to W3C Proposed Recommendation and commence W3C Advisory Committee review.

A version of this document which may have been updated, possibly with new implementation experience or to reflect the status of the specifications, is linked from the RDFCore overview page.

The Working Group has developed the following specification, test materials, and supplementary documentation for RDF:

• RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Dave Beckett, ed.

  Editor's draft notes changes since 10 Oct last call. (v 1.50 includes changes discussed 7Nov)

• RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Dan Brickley, R.V. Guha, eds.

  Changes as discussed in replies to commentors 17 Oct and 7 Nov are to appear in an editor's draft presently.

• RDF Semantics
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Patrick Hayes, ed.

  Editorial revisions in response to a detailed review of the proofs by ter Horst have been integrated into the editor's draft. Changes since the 10 Oct WD are noted.

• RDF Primer
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Frank Manola, Eric Miller, eds.

  editorial updates in response to comments submitted 10 Oct, 5 Nov, 7 Nov and 7 Nov are to appear in an editor's draft presently.

• RDF Test Cases
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Jan Grant, Dave Beckett, eds.

  editor's draft notes recent changes.

• Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax
  W3C Working Draft 10 October 2003
  Graham Klyne, Jeremy Carroll, eds.

  Editor's draft notes changes since the 10 Oct WD.

Review of the above drafts began drafts of RDF Semantics and RDF Syntax in September 2001 and RDF Schema in April 2002. Remaining parts of the original RDF Model and Syntax specification appeared subsequently in RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax, supplemented by the RDF Primer.

The working group addressed comments on these drafts on a best-effort basis as it worked thru its list of 60+ issues.

After resolving all of the issues, last call working drafts were published in January 2003 and last call comments were formally addressed. The Working Group made a number of changes in response to these comments, and then issued a second last call in October 2003. Comments on the 2nd last call were also formally addressed.

While the vast majority of the issues were resolved by consensus, three issues with outstanding objections remain: datatypes, XML Literals, and validating RDF.

The the RDF Core test case results and the following implementation exprience validate the design and motivates widespread deployment.

CVS log of changes since 7Nov WG decision:

$Log: 20030331-advance.html,v $
Revision 1.39  2003/12/03 14:43:19  em
updated to make xhtml valid

Revision 1.38  2003/11/17 10:15:28  bmcbride
Added reference to WG version of request

Revision 1.37  2003/11/17 10:01:08  bmcbride
updated doc status

Revision 1.36  2003/11/14 18:52:39  bmcbride
Removed draft status and final @@'s

Revision 1.34  2003/11/13 20:24:28  em
added hr

Revision 1.33  2003/11/13 20:23:18  em
style changes

Revision 1.32  2003/11/13 20:22:00  em
style changes

Revision 1.31  2003/11/13 20:18:01  em
updated to wrap up impl section

Revision 1.30  2003/11/13 20:16:49  em
updated to wrap up impl section

Revision 1.29  2003/11/13 20:12:24  em
updated to wrap up impl section

Revision 1.28  2003/11/13 20:08:37  em
updated to wrap up impl section

Revision 1.27  2003/11/13 19:44:26  em
updated to fix merge problems in summary of review section

Revision 1.26  2003/11/13 19:41:25  em
updating implementation section

Revision 1.25  2003/11/12 22:33:58  connolly
rewrote summary of review, noting when 1st WDs went out,
telling good news about lots of issues resolved by
consensus.
left an @@ to represent the pending responses to LC2 comments

Revision 1.24  2003/11/12 21:49:48  connolly
punted pending edits on test, concepts to Brian
completed this pass of the titles section

Revision 1.23  2003/11/12 18:54:32  connolly
cited current primer, pending edits

Revision 1.22  2003/11/12 18:07:06  connolly
cited semantics LC2, editor's draft, noted pending changes

Revision 1.21  2003/11/12 15:39:27  connolly
finished citing schema for request-for-PR purposes; noted minor changes pending

Revision 1.20  2003/11/12 15:23:32  connolly
cited syntax spec: 10Oct LC version, editors draft, changes

Revision 1.19  2003/11/12 14:49:48  connolly
link WG decision, start change log

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3