A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/007431.html below:

[PEP202 listcomps] (was RE: [Python-Dev] Product iteration)

[PEP202 listcomps] (was RE: [Python-Dev] Product iteration) [PEP202 listcomps] (was RE: [Python-Dev] Product iteration)Guido van Rossum guido@beopen.com
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:00:33 -0500
> is there any special reason why we cannot use colon instead
> of "for"?

Would conflict with the proposed syntax for range literals.  Both

  [0:10]

and

  [x : x in seq]

have the same syntactical form.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4