On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 04:18:03PM +0300, Moshe Zadka wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Thomas Wouters wrote: > > I'd personally like to hear some votes/opinions on the range literal patch, > Didn't Guido urge you to check it in? I have *no* idea :) The 'Right!' seemed to imply that, but I doubt he'd let me check it in without *someone* reviewing it ;) > > - Better error message with UnboundLocalError > > Patch looks okay to me, and Tim already said he liked the idea. > But it seems he had a quibble with the style -- so it's better to wait > until he approves. I think we *should* assign it to him, and bug him > about it. Any other opinions? The style issue is history. The new version is style-conforming, I think, asside from a small bug in the definition of the helper function (see the comment, Paul ;) That doesn't mean Tim shouldn't check it first, though. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4