Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/006378.html below:

[Python-Dev] Iterating in parallel

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Iterating in parallel
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Iterating in parallel
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> Sorry for flip-flopping on this -- to Paul especially -- but
> parallel() is looking better and better as i compare it with these
> other alternatives.

Strong -1 on parallel() unless it really performs concurrent execution.
I'd take any of the other suggestions (except "zip()") over this.

Greg

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Iterating in parallel
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Iterating in parallel
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4