Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Do we really want to live on with SourceForge(t) ?
> > It seems to be pleasant for small projects, but
> > maybe it would be more convenient to have a CVS
> > that we control directly?
> > The new starship is very powerful and could stand a couple of
> > CVS repositories easily.
> >
> > While one might argue that this would give to much of Python
> > to BeOpen (they got it already:), I think this could work
> > smoothly.
>
> In my experience, maintaining the repository, with both anonymous and
> privileged (commit) access, is a lot of work -- managing user accounts
> for the privileged, keeping the machine up and running, etc. I'm
> really quite happy with the level of support we get from SF.
Sure, if you have many projects and many users.
> In the long run, BeOpen might be interested in running this kind of
> service for the Python and other communities; but for now, it would
> just be a burden.
I was thinking of creating this service on the starship machine,
and just for the couple of projects that we need, without help
from BeOpen. I could initiate such a service, since it was one
of our goals when we have a more powerful machine, and now we
have it.
But without interest I can save the time.
- chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4