>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip@mojam.com> writes: SM> Was there a public announcement made about new functionality for SM> 2.0? I had submitted list comprehensions to the old 1.6 cycle, SM> and it was being held to the now never-to-be 1.7. Are we in SM> feature freeze for 2.0 at this point? SM> I can do one of three things: SM> * commit the changes I have currently against the CVS SM> repository SM> * bundle up another patch for people to examine and comment SM> on SM> * shut up and go do something more useful At lunch today, Guido raised almost the same question! Tim and I argued that we should continue the feature freeze, and spend any extra time wasted while we wait for CNRI to quit stalling to resolve open bugs and do more testing. It's been a long time since the last bug fix release, and there are already a lot of new features. We'd probably be best served by working hard to make 2.0 stable and solid -- and then getting 2.1 released quickly. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4