Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28892839 below:

Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rates: Outcomes of quality improvement program

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

• PMID: 28892839
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13984

Item in Clipboard

Suryakanth R Gurudu et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar.

• ¹ Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

• PMID: 28892839
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13984

Item in Clipboard

Background and aim: Feedback has been shown to improve performance in colonoscopy including adenoma detection rate (ADR). The frequency at which feedback should be given is unknown. As part of a quality improvement program, we sought to measure the outcome of providing quarterly and monthly feedback on colonoscopy quality measures.

Methods: All screening colonoscopies performed at endoscopy unit at Mayo Clinic Arizona by gastroenterologists between October 2010 and December 2012 were reviewed. Quality indicators, including ADR, were extracted for each individual endoscopist, and feedback was provided. The study period was divided into four distinct groups: pre-intervention that served as baseline, quarterly feedback, monthly feedback, and post-intervention. Based on ADR, endoscopists were grouped into "low detectors" (≤ 25%), "average detectors" (26-35%), and "high detectors" (> 35%).

Results: A total of 3420 screening colonoscopies were performed during the study period (555 patients during pre-intervention, 1209 patients during quarterly feedback, 599 during monthly feedback, and 1057 during the post-intervention period) by 16 gastroenterologists. The overall ADR for the group improved from 30.5% to 37.7% (P = 0.003). Compared with the pre-interventional period, all quality indicators measured significantly improved during the monthly feedback and post-intervention periods but not in the quarterly feedback period.

Conclusions: In our quality improvement program, monthly feedback significantly improved colonoscopy quality measures, including ADR, while quarterly feedback did not. The impact of the intervention was most prominent in the "low detectors" group. Results were durable up to 6 months following the intervention.

Keywords: colonoscopy; feedback; quality indicators; screening.

© 2017 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

• Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.

  Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS, Mears R, Johnson CS. Kahi CJ, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23472996

• Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.

  Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Kraszewska E, Kobiela J, Franczyk R, Rupinska M, Kocot B, Chaber-Ciopinska A, Pachlewski J, Polkowski M, Regula J. Kaminski MF, et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):98-105. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 17. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 28428142

• Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.

  Abdul-Baki H, Schoen RE, Dean K, Rose S, Leffler DA, Kuganeswaran E, Morris M, Carrell D, Mehrotra A. Abdul-Baki H, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26385276 Free PMC article.

• Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  Bishay K, Causada-Calo N, Scaffidi MA, Walsh CM, Anderson JT, Rostom A, Dube C, Keswani RN, Heitman SJ, Hilsden RJ, Shorr R, Grover SC, Forbes N. Bishay K, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov;92(5):1030-1040.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3865. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID: 32330506 Review.

• Can I improve my adenoma detection rate?

  Chaptini L, Laine L. Chaptini L, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;49(4):270-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000293. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25647725 Review.

• Assessment of the impact of power business intelligence on adenoma detection rate: a prospective observational trial.

  Hsu YH, Cheng CH, Ko PH, Tang CP, Huang CW, Tseng CW. Hsu YH, et al. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 19;25(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03894-z. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40253361 Free PMC article.

• The National Endoscopy Database (NED) Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial (APRIQOT) randomized controlled trial design.

  Catlow J, Sharp L, Kasim A, Lu L, Brookes M, Lee T, McCarthy S, Gray J, Sniehotta F, Deane J, Rutter M. Catlow J, et al. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Nov;8(11):E1545-E1552. doi: 10.1055/a-1261-3151. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Endosc Int Open. 2020. PMID: 33140009 Free PMC article.

• Expert endoscopists with high adenoma detection rates frequently detect diminutive adenomas in proximal colon.

  Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Yoshida S, Sekiba K, Kataoka Y, Hata K, Watanabe H, Tsuji Y, Koike K. Toyoshima O, et al. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jun;8(6):E775-E782. doi: 10.1055/a-1136-9971. Epub 2020 May 25. Endosc Int Open. 2020. PMID: 32490163 Free PMC article.

• Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  Boregowda U, Desai M, Nutalapati V, Paleti S, Olyaee M, Rastogi A. Boregowda U, et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):214-223. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0591. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33654362 Free PMC article.

• Confounders in Adenoma Detection at Initial Screening Colonoscopy: A Factor in the Assessment of Racial Disparities as a Risk for Colon Cancer.

  David Y, Ottaviano L, Park J, Iqbal S, Likhtshteyn M, Kumar S, Lyo H, Lewis AE, Lung BE, Frye JT, Huang L, Li E, Yang J, Martello L, Vignesh S, Miller JD, Follen M, Grossman EB. David Y, et al. J Cancer Ther. 2019 Apr;10(4):269-289. doi: 10.4236/jct.2019.104022. Epub 2019 Apr 9. J Cancer Ther. 2019. PMID: 31032142 Free PMC article.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3