Affiliations
AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rateHeitham Abdul-Baki et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058. AffiliationsItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Colonoscopy is the predominant method for colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Previous studies have documented variation across physicians in colonoscopy quality as measured by the adenoma detection rate (ADR). ADR is the primary quality measure of colonoscopy examinations and an indicator of the likelihood of subsequent colorectal cancer. There is interest in mechanisms to improve the ADR. In Central Illinois, a local employer and a quality improvement organization partnered to publically report physician colonoscopy quality.
Objective: We assessed whether this initiative was associated with an improvement in the ADR.
Design: We compared ADRs before and after public reporting at a private practice endoscopy center with 11 gastroenterologists in Peoria, Illinois, who participated in the initiative. To generate the ADR, colonoscopy and pathology reports from examinations performed over 4 years at the endoscopy center were analyzed by using previously validated natural language processing software.
Setting: A central Illinois endoscopy center.
Results: The ADR in the pre-public reporting period was 34.3% and 39.2% in the post-public reporting period (an increase of 4.9%, P < .001). The increase in the right-sided ADR was 5.1% (P < .01), whereas the increase in the left-sided ADR was 2.1% (P < .05). The increase in the ADR was 7.8% for screening colonoscopies (P < 0.05) and 3.5% for nonscreening colonoscopies (P < .05). All but 1 physician's ADR increased (range -2.7% to 10.5%). There was no statistically significant change in the advanced ADR (increase of 0.8%, P = .22).
Limitations: There was no concurrent control group to assess whether the increased ADR was due to a secular trend.
Conclusion: A public reporting initiative on colonoscopy quality was associated with an increase in ADR.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
FiguresFigure 1
Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma…
Figure 1
Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates in pre and post reporting periods
Figure 1Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates in pre and post reporting periods
Figure 2
ADR by physician in pre…
Figure 2
ADR by physician in pre and post reporting periods
Figure 2ADR by physician in pre and post reporting periods
Similar articlesMarcondes FO, Dean KM, Schoen RE, Leffler DA, Rose S, Morris M, Mehrotra A. Marcondes FO, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):668-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.056. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 26385275 Free PMC article.
Gawron AJ, Thompson WK, Keswani RN, Rasmussen LV, Kho AN. Gawron AJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;109(12):1844-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.147. Epub 2014 Jun 17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24935271
Jover R, Zapater P, Bujanda L, Hernández V, Cubiella J, Pellisé M, Ponce M, Ono A, Lanas A, Seoane A, Marín-Gabriel JC, Chaparro M, Cacho G, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Fernández-Díez S, Peris A, Nicolás-Pérez D, Murcia O, Castells A, Quintero E; COLONPREV Study Investigators. Jover R, et al. Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):241-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. Epub 2016 Feb 4. Endoscopy. 2016. PMID: 26845473
Brunner KT, Calderwood AH. Brunner KT, et al. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):461. doi: 10.1007/s11894-015-0461-1. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26292664 Review.
Chaptini L, Laine L. Chaptini L, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;49(4):270-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000293. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25647725 Review.
Sey MSL, Liu A, Asfaha S, Siebring V, Jairath V, Yan B. Sey MSL, et al. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Jul;5(7):E675-E682. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110568. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Endosc Int Open. 2017. PMID: 28691053 Free PMC article.
Boregowda U, Desai M, Nutalapati V, Paleti S, Olyaee M, Rastogi A. Boregowda U, et al. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):214-223. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0591. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33654362 Free PMC article.
Lim S, Tritto G, Zeki S, DeMartino S. Lim S, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 May 6;13(6):509-516. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102091. eCollection 2022. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 36250166 Free PMC article.
León Moreno JF. León Moreno JF. Endosc Int Open. 2018 Nov;6(11):E1304-E1309. doi: 10.1055/a-0672-1045. Epub 2018 Nov 7. Endosc Int Open. 2018. PMID: 30410949 Free PMC article.
Taveira F, Areia M, Elvas L, Alves S, Brito D, Saraiva S, Cadime AT. Taveira F, et al. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;24(5):211-218. doi: 10.1159/000478940. Epub 2017 Jul 21. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29255755 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3