A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385276 below:

Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate

doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate

Affiliations

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate

Heitham Abdul-Baki et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct.

doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.058. Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is the predominant method for colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Previous studies have documented variation across physicians in colonoscopy quality as measured by the adenoma detection rate (ADR). ADR is the primary quality measure of colonoscopy examinations and an indicator of the likelihood of subsequent colorectal cancer. There is interest in mechanisms to improve the ADR. In Central Illinois, a local employer and a quality improvement organization partnered to publically report physician colonoscopy quality.

Objective: We assessed whether this initiative was associated with an improvement in the ADR.

Design: We compared ADRs before and after public reporting at a private practice endoscopy center with 11 gastroenterologists in Peoria, Illinois, who participated in the initiative. To generate the ADR, colonoscopy and pathology reports from examinations performed over 4 years at the endoscopy center were analyzed by using previously validated natural language processing software.

Setting: A central Illinois endoscopy center.

Results: The ADR in the pre-public reporting period was 34.3% and 39.2% in the post-public reporting period (an increase of 4.9%, P < .001). The increase in the right-sided ADR was 5.1% (P < .01), whereas the increase in the left-sided ADR was 2.1% (P < .05). The increase in the ADR was 7.8% for screening colonoscopies (P < 0.05) and 3.5% for nonscreening colonoscopies (P < .05). All but 1 physician's ADR increased (range -2.7% to 10.5%). There was no statistically significant change in the advanced ADR (increase of 0.8%, P = .22).

Limitations: There was no concurrent control group to assess whether the increased ADR was due to a secular trend.

Conclusion: A public reporting initiative on colonoscopy quality was associated with an increase in ADR.

Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma…

Figure 1

Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates in pre and post reporting periods

Figure 1

Polyp, adenoma and advanced adenoma detection rates in pre and post reporting periods

Figure 2

ADR by physician in pre…

Figure 2

ADR by physician in pre and post reporting periods

Figure 2

ADR by physician in pre and post reporting periods

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1624–33. - PubMed
    1. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O’Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366:2345–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, Risio M, Sciallero S, Zappa M, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Casella C, Crosta C, Falcini F, Ferrero F, Giacomin A, Giuliani O, Santarelli A, Visioli CB, Zanetti R, Atkin WS, Senore C. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2011;103:1310–22. - PubMed
    1. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41. - PubMed
    1. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 362:1795–803. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3