A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24275632 below:

Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation

. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000535. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000535. Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation Dajuanicia N HolmesJonathan P PicciniJack AnsellPaul ChangGregg C FonarowBernard GershKenneth W MahaffeyPeter R KoweyMichael D EzekowitzDaniel E SingerLaine ThomasEric D PetersonElaine M HylekOutcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients

Affiliations

Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation

Benjamin A Steinberg et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013.

. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000535. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000535. Authors Benjamin A Steinberg  1 Dajuanicia N HolmesJonathan P PicciniJack AnsellPaul ChangGregg C FonarowBernard GershKenneth W MahaffeyPeter R KoweyMichael D EzekowitzDaniel E SingerLaine ThomasEric D PetersonElaine M HylekOutcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients Affiliation

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background: Dabigatran is a novel oral anticoagulant approved for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Adoption patterns of this new agent in community practice are unknown.

Methods and results: We studied patterns of dabigatran use among patients enrolled in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry between June 2010 and August 2011 and followed for 12 months. Among 9974 atrial fibrillation patients included, 1217 (12%) were treated with dabigatran during the study. Overall, patients receiving dabigatran were younger (median age 72 versus 75 years, P<0.0001), more likely to be white (92% versus 89%, P=0.005), more likely to have private insurance (33% versus 25%, P<0.0001), and less likely to have prior cardiovascular disease (4% versus 33%, P<0.0001). They had more new-onset atrial fibrillation (8.8% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001), lower CHADS2 scores (estimated risk based on the presence of congestive heart failure, hypertension, aged ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack; mean 2.0 versus 2.3, P<0.0001), and lower Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation scores (mean 2.4 versus 2.8, P<0.0001). More than half (n=14/25, 56%) of patients with severe kidney disease were not prescribed reduced dosing, whereas 10% (n=91/920) with preserved renal function received lower dosing. Among patients not on dabigatran at baseline, 8% had dabigatran initiated during follow-up. Patient education was significantly associated with switching from warfarin to dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio for postgraduate 1.73, P=0.007), whereas antiarrhythmic drug use significantly correlated with de novo adoption of dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients receiving dabigatran were younger and at a lower risk of stroke and bleeding. Patients appeared to drive switching from warfarin, whereas clinical characteristics influenced de novo start of dabigatran. These data suggest cautious early uptake of dabigatran, and more careful attention to dosing adjustments is warranted.

Clinical trial registration url: Clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01165710.

Keywords: anticoagulant; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; dosing; pharmacoepidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs…

Figure 1.

Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs emergence of novel oral anticoagulants in the US.…

Figure 1.

Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs emergence of novel oral anticoagulants in the US. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Figure 2.

Patient inclusion and exclusion in…

Figure 2.

Patient inclusion and exclusion in the current analysis. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for…

Figure 2.

Patient inclusion and exclusion in the current analysis. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Figure 3.

Temporal adoption of dabigatran in…

Figure 3.

Temporal adoption of dabigatran in ORBIT‐AF. OAC indicates oral anticoagulation; ORBIT‐AF, Outcomes Registry…

Figure 3.

Temporal adoption of dabigatran in ORBIT‐AF. OAC indicates oral anticoagulation; ORBIT‐AF, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Figure 4.

Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall…

Figure 4.

Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall and in high‐risk subgroups. Numbers may not sum…

Figure 4.

Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall and in high‐risk subgroups. Numbers may not sum to 100% due to reporting of other dosing regimens. *Excludes patients with CrCl <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2. CrCl indicates creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft‐Gault formula.

Figure 5.

Factors significantly associated with adoption…

Figure 5.

Factors significantly associated with adoption of dabigatran at follow‐up in patients receiving warfarin…

Figure 5.

Factors significantly associated with adoption of dabigatran at follow‐up in patients receiving warfarin at baseline (A, c‐index=0.65) and in patients not using anticoagulation at baseline (B, c‐index=0.71). Reference groups: Race (vs white), AF type (vs long‐standing persistent), Education level (vs some school). AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; ECG, electrocardiogram; MI, myocardial infarction; OAC, oral anticoagulation.

Similar articles Cited by References
    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991; 22:983-988 - PubMed
    1. Ezekowitz MD, Levine JA. Preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 1999; 281:1830-1835 - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1139-1151 - PubMed
    1. Beasley BN, Unger EF, Temple R. Anticoagulant options—why the FDA approved a higher but not a lower dose of dabigatran. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:1788-1790 - PubMed
    1. Huang C, Siu M, Vu L, Wong S, Shin J. Factors influencing doctors' selection of dabigatran in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013; 19:938-943 - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3