Affiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillationBenjamin A Steinberg et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013.
. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000535. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000535. Authors Benjamin A Steinberg 1 , Dajuanicia N Holmes, Jonathan P Piccini, Jack Ansell, Paul Chang, Gregg C Fonarow, Bernard Gersh, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Peter R Kowey, Michael D Ezekowitz, Daniel E Singer, Laine Thomas, Eric D Peterson, Elaine M Hylek; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Investigators and Patients AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractBackground: Dabigatran is a novel oral anticoagulant approved for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Adoption patterns of this new agent in community practice are unknown.
Methods and results: We studied patterns of dabigatran use among patients enrolled in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry between June 2010 and August 2011 and followed for 12 months. Among 9974 atrial fibrillation patients included, 1217 (12%) were treated with dabigatran during the study. Overall, patients receiving dabigatran were younger (median age 72 versus 75 years, P<0.0001), more likely to be white (92% versus 89%, P=0.005), more likely to have private insurance (33% versus 25%, P<0.0001), and less likely to have prior cardiovascular disease (4% versus 33%, P<0.0001). They had more new-onset atrial fibrillation (8.8% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001), lower CHADS2 scores (estimated risk based on the presence of congestive heart failure, hypertension, aged ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack; mean 2.0 versus 2.3, P<0.0001), and lower Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation scores (mean 2.4 versus 2.8, P<0.0001). More than half (n=14/25, 56%) of patients with severe kidney disease were not prescribed reduced dosing, whereas 10% (n=91/920) with preserved renal function received lower dosing. Among patients not on dabigatran at baseline, 8% had dabigatran initiated during follow-up. Patient education was significantly associated with switching from warfarin to dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio for postgraduate 1.73, P=0.007), whereas antiarrhythmic drug use significantly correlated with de novo adoption of dabigatran (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, P<0.0001).
Conclusions: Patients receiving dabigatran were younger and at a lower risk of stroke and bleeding. Patients appeared to drive switching from warfarin, whereas clinical characteristics influenced de novo start of dabigatran. These data suggest cautious early uptake of dabigatran, and more careful attention to dosing adjustments is warranted.
Clinical trial registration url: Clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01165710.
Keywords: anticoagulant; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; dosing; pharmacoepidemiology.
FiguresFigure 1.
Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs…
Figure 1.
Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs emergence of novel oral anticoagulants in the US.…
Figure 1.Timeline of ORBIT‐AF enrollment vs emergence of novel oral anticoagulants in the US. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 2.
Patient inclusion and exclusion in…
Figure 2.
Patient inclusion and exclusion in the current analysis. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for…
Figure 2.Patient inclusion and exclusion in the current analysis. ORBIT‐AF indicates Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 3.
Temporal adoption of dabigatran in…
Figure 3.
Temporal adoption of dabigatran in ORBIT‐AF. OAC indicates oral anticoagulation; ORBIT‐AF, Outcomes Registry…
Figure 3.Temporal adoption of dabigatran in ORBIT‐AF. OAC indicates oral anticoagulation; ORBIT‐AF, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.
Figure 4.
Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall…
Figure 4.
Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall and in high‐risk subgroups. Numbers may not sum…
Figure 4.Distribution of dabigatran dosing overall and in high‐risk subgroups. Numbers may not sum to 100% due to reporting of other dosing regimens. *Excludes patients with CrCl <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2. CrCl indicates creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft‐Gault formula.
Figure 5.
Factors significantly associated with adoption…
Figure 5.
Factors significantly associated with adoption of dabigatran at follow‐up in patients receiving warfarin…
Figure 5.Factors significantly associated with adoption of dabigatran at follow‐up in patients receiving warfarin at baseline (A, c‐index=0.65) and in patients not using anticoagulation at baseline (B, c‐index=0.71). Reference groups: Race (vs white), AF type (vs long‐standing persistent), Education level (vs some school). AF indicates atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; ECG, electrocardiogram; MI, myocardial infarction; OAC, oral anticoagulation.
Similar articlesSteinberg BA, Kim S, Piccini JP, Fonarow GC, Lopes RD, Thomas L, Ezekowitz MD, Ansell J, Kowey P, Singer DE, Gersh B, Mahaffey KW, Hylek E, Go AS, Chang P, Peterson ED; ORBIT-AF Investigators and Patients. Steinberg BA, et al. Circulation. 2013 Aug 13;128(7):721-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002927. Epub 2013 Jul 16. Circulation. 2013. PMID: 23861512 Free PMC article.
Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K, Thomas L, Allen LA, Ansell J, Chan PS, Ezekowitz MD, Fonarow GC, Freeman JV, Gersh BJ, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Naccarelli GV, Reiffel JA, Singer DE, Peterson ED, Piccini JP; Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT‐AF) II Investigators. Steinberg BA, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):e007633. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007633. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29453305 Free PMC article.
Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, Sheu TC, Mott K, Goulding MR, Houstoun M, MaCurdy TE, Worrall C, Kelman JA. Graham DJ, et al. Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):157-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012061. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Circulation. 2015. PMID: 25359164
Brunetti L, Chen C, White J. Brunetti L, et al. Consult Pharm. 2014 Mar;29(3):169-78. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.169. Consult Pharm. 2014. PMID: 24589766 Review.
Panchenko EP. Panchenko EP. Kardiologiia. 2011;51(11):83-90. Kardiologiia. 2011. PMID: 22117775 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
Meyer Dos Santos S, Harder S. Meyer Dos Santos S, et al. Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):295-307. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0151-1. Drug Saf. 2014. PMID: 24683059 Review.
Perreault S, Dragomir A, Côté R, Lenglet A, de Denus S, Dorais M, White-Guay B, Brophy J, Schnitzer ME, Dubé MP, Tardif JC. Perreault S, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 14;12:812018. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.812018. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35095525 Free PMC article.
Yildirim M, Hund H, Mueller-Hennessen M, Katus HA, Frey N, Giannitsis E, Salbach C. Yildirim M, et al. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Jan 3;56:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101598. eCollection 2025 Feb. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025. PMID: 39867851 Free PMC article.
Westreich R, Tsaban G, Barrett O, Kezerle L, Tsadok MA, Akriv A, Bachrach A, Leventer-Roberts M, Senderey AB, Haim M. Westreich R, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Feb;57(2):322-329. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02913-8. Epub 2023 Nov 9. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024. PMID: 37945939
Lo-Ciganic WH, Gellad WF, Huskamp HA, Choudhry NK, Chang CC, Zhang R, Jones BL, Guclu H, Richards-Shubik S, Donohue JM. Lo-Ciganic WH, et al. Med Care. 2016 Jul;54(7):725-32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000549. Med Care. 2016. PMID: 27116109 Free PMC article.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3