Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833205 below:

Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities

Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. lina.jandorf@mssm.edu

• PMID: 22833205
• PMCID: PMC3492525
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27759

Item in Clipboard

Randomized Controlled Trial

Lina Jandorf et al. Cancer. 2013.

• ¹ Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. lina.jandorf@mssm.edu

• PMID: 22833205
• PMCID: PMC3492525
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27759

Item in Clipboard

Background: Patient navigation (PN) is being used increasingly to help patients complete screening colonoscopy (SC) to prevent colorectal cancer. At their large, urban academic medical center with an open-access endoscopy system, the authors previously demonstrated that PN programs produced a colonoscopy completion rate of 78.5% in a cohort of 503 patients (predominantly African Americans and Latinos with public health insurance). Very little is known about the direct costs of implementing PN programs. The objective of the current study was to perform a detailed cost analysis of PN programs at the authors' institution from an institutional perspective.

Methods: In 2 randomized controlled trials, average-risk patients who were referred for SC by primary care providers were recruited for PN between May 2008 and May 2010. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 PN groups. The cost of PN and net income to the institution were determined in a cost analysis.

Results: Among 395 patients who completed colonoscopy, 53.4% underwent SC alone, 30.1% underwent colonoscopy with biopsy, and 16.5% underwent snare polypectomy. Accounting for the average contribution margins of each procedure type, the total revenue was $95,266.00. The total cost of PN was $14,027.30. Net income was $81,238.70. In a model sample of 1000 patients, net incomes for the institutional completion rate (approximately 80%), the historic PN program (approximately 65%), and the national average (approximately 50%) were compared. The current PN program generated additional net incomes of $35,035.50 and $44,956.00, respectively.

Conclusions: PN among minority patients with mostly public health insurance generated additional income to the institution, mainly because of increased colonoscopy completion rates.

Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Algorithm of patients in the…

Algorithm of patients in the current PN studies

Algorithm of patients in the current PN studies

• Cost-effectiveness of a patient navigation intervention to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income adults in New Hampshire.

  Rice K, Sharma K, Li C, Butterly L, Gersten J, DeGroff A. Rice K, et al. Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;125(4):601-609. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31864. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30548480 Free PMC article.

• Predicting Colonoscopy Completion Among African American and Latino/a Participants in a Patient Navigation Program.

  Pelto DJ, Sly JR, Winkel G, Redd W, Thompson HS, Itzkowitz SH, Jandorf L. Pelto DJ, et al. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015 Mar;2(1):101-11. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0053-z. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015. PMID: 25893157 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

• Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

  Kim KE, Randal F, Johnson M, Quinn M, Maene C, Hoover S, Richmond-Reese V, K L Tangka F, Joseph DA, Subramanian S. Kim KE, et al. Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4137-4144. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31690. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30359474 Free PMC article.

• Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.

  Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB. Fisher JA, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):108-13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0198. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006. PMID: 16434595 Review.

• Patient Navigation in Cancer: The Business Case to Support Clinical Needs.

  Kline RM, Rocque GB, Rohan EA, Blackley KA, Cantril CA, Pratt-Chapman ML, Burris HA, Shulman LN. Kline RM, et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):585-590. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00230. Epub 2019 Sep 11. J Oncol Pract. 2019. PMID: 31509483 Free PMC article. Review.

• Evolution of a longitudinal, multidisciplinary, and scalable patient navigation matrix model.

  Corbett CM, Somers TJ, Nuñez CM, Majestic CM, Shelby RA, Worthy VC, Barrett NJ, Patierno SR. Corbett CM, et al. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3202-3210. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2950. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32129946 Free PMC article. Review.

• Economic evaluation of patient navigation programs in colorectal cancer care, a systematic review.

  Gervès-Pinquié C, Girault A, Phillips S, Raskin S, Pratt-Chapman M. Gervès-Pinquié C, et al. Health Econ Rev. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0196-4. Health Econ Rev. 2018. PMID: 29904805 Free PMC article. Review.

• Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men.

  Wilson FA, Villarreal R, Stimpson JP, Pagán JA. Wilson FA, et al. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):260-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0718-7. J Cancer Educ. 2015. PMID: 25168070

• Patient-Reported Attributions for Missed Colonoscopy Appointments in Two Large Healthcare Systems.

  Bhise V, Modi V, Kalavar A, Espadas D, Hanser L, Gould M, El-Serag HB, Singh H. Bhise V, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jul;61(7):1853-61. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4096-3. Epub 2016 Mar 12. Dig Dis Sci. 2016. PMID: 26971093

• Cost-effectiveness of a patient navigation intervention to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income adults in New Hampshire.

  Rice K, Sharma K, Li C, Butterly L, Gersten J, DeGroff A. Rice K, et al. Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;125(4):601-609. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31864. Epub 2018 Dec 12. Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30548480 Free PMC article.

1. 1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, Mcfarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595. - PubMed
2. 1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national polyp study workgroup. New Eng J Med. 1993;329(27):1977–1983. - PubMed
3. 1. Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Schrag D, et al. How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.? Mortality projections for scenarios of risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer. 2006;107(7):1624–1633. - PubMed
4. 1. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):1–8. - PubMed
5. 1. Calonge N, Petitti DB, Dewitt TG, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637. - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3