Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21239688 below:

Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns

Affiliations

• ¹ Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 135 Cannon Street, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. zapka@musc.edu

• PMID: 21239688
• PMCID: PMC3050999
• DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749

Item in Clipboard

Jane M Zapka et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar.

• ¹ Department of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 135 Cannon Street, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. zapka@musc.edu

• PMID: 21239688
• PMCID: PMC3050999
• DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749

Item in Clipboard

Background: Primary care physician (PCP) actions are pivotal to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening performance, and guidelines recommend discussion with patients about test options and potential benefits and harms. This article profiles patterns of discussion about and recommendations for screening and explores potential associations with multilevel factors (patient, clinician, practice, and environment).

Methods: In 2009, we analyzed data from 1,266 physicians responding to the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Lung Cancer Screening (absolute response rate=69.3%; cooperation rate=75.0%). Descriptive statistics examined physicians' reports of discussion and recommendations. Multivariate analyses assessed the associations of these practices with multilevel factors.

Results: Although few respondents reported discussion of all options, 46% usually discuss more than one option; the vast majority of these respondents discuss fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy (49%) or FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy (32%). Of physicians who discuss more than one option, a majority reported usually recommending one or more test options, most commonly colonoscopy alone (43%) and FOBT and colonoscopy (43%). Several personal characteristics (specialty), perceived patient characteristics (prefer physician to decide), practice characteristics (geographic location), and community barriers (specialist availability) were independently associated with discussion and/or recommendation patterns.

Conclusions: PCPs do not discuss the full menu of test options, but many report selecting one or two options for discussion and recommendation. To ensure that patients' perspectives and concerns are elicited and considered, patient decision-making approaches should be considered.

Impact: Attention to informed decision making in CRC screening will be important for enhancing patient-centered quality care.

©2011 AACR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

• Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

  Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan G, Vernon SW. Klabunde CN, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 May 13. Am J Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 19442479 Free PMC article.

• Primary care colorectal cancer screening recommendation patterns: associated factors and screening outcomes.

  Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Liles EG, Smith DH, Rosales AG, Schneider JL, Lafata JE, Myers RE, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE. Feldstein AC, et al. Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):198-208. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11406285. Epub 2011 Jun 7. Med Decis Making. 2012. PMID: 21652776 Free PMC article.

• Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?

  Yabroff KR, Klabunde CN, Yuan G, McNeel TS, Brown ML, Casciotti D, Buckman DW, Taplin S. Yabroff KR, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5. Epub 2010 Oct 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 20949328 Free PMC article.

• Screening for colorectal cancer: the role of the primary care physician.

  Triantafillidis JK, Vagianos C, Gikas A, Korontzi M, Papalois A. Triantafillidis JK, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000759. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 27676092 Free PMC article. Review.

• Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.

  Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Ruffin MT, et al. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.13.1.1. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000. PMID: 10682879 Review.

• Challenges in meeting Healthy People 2020 objectives for cancer-related preventive services, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 and 2010.

  Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, White MC, Richardson LC, McNeel TS. Brown ML, et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Feb 27;11:E29. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130174. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014. PMID: 24576396 Free PMC article.

• Influences and Practices in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Health Care Providers Serving Northern Plains American Indians, 2011-2012.

  Nadeau M, Walaszek A, Perdue DG, Rhodes KL, Haverkamp D, Forster J. Nadeau M, et al. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Dec 15;13:E167. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160267. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016. PMID: 27978410 Free PMC article.

• Sociodemographic differences in fears and mistrust contributing to unwillingness to participate in cancer screenings.

  Davis JL, Bynum SA, Katz RV, Buchanan K, Green BL. Davis JL, et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4 Suppl):67-76. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0148. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012. PMID: 23124501 Free PMC article.

• Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.

  Waller J, Macedo A, von Wagner C, Simon AE, Jones C, Hammersley V, Weller D, Wardle J, Campbell C. Waller J, et al. Br J Cancer. 2012 Dec 4;107(12):1938-43. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.512. Epub 2012 Nov 22. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 23175148 Free PMC article.

• Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) versus colonoscopy: Does knowing that a positive FIT requires a follow-up colonoscopy affect initial decision making in the US?

  Shergill J, Makaroff KE, Lauzon M, Spiegel BMR, Almario CV. Shergill J, et al. Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 13;27:101825. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101825. eCollection 2022 Jun. Prev Med Rep. 2022. PMID: 35656227 Free PMC article.

1. 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2008 Mar–Apr;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
2. 1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2008.
3. 1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2008 May–June;58(3):130–60. - PubMed
4. 1. Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Thompson TD, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jul;17(7):1623–30. - PubMed
5. 1. Klabunde CN, Meissner HI, Wooten KG, Breen N, Singleton JA. Comparing colorectal cancer screening and immunization status in older americans. American journal of preventive medicine. 2007 Jul;33(1):1–8. - PMC - PubMed

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3