Review
. 2000 Jun 1;151(11):1039-48; discussion 1049-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010145. Epidemiology of transmissible diseases after eliminationAffiliations
AffiliationItem in Clipboard
Review
Epidemiology of transmissible diseases after eliminationG De Serres et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2000.
. 2000 Jun 1;151(11):1039-48; discussion 1049-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010145. AffiliationItem in Clipboard
AbstractElimination of an infectious disease is often understood to mean the total absence of cases in a population. This situation can occur only if the entire population is immune as a result of either natural disease or vaccination. However, this costly and unrealistic scenario is not necessary to ensure elimination, more appropriately defined as a situation in which sustained transmission cannot occur and secondary spread from importations of disease will end naturally, without intervention. The authors describe the size and duration of outbreaks caused by imported infections after indigenous transmission has been eliminated. They show that the status of the elimination process can be monitored by assessing the proportion of cases imported and the distribution of outbreak sizes. Measles in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom provides a good example of the relevance of these criteria. Surveillance of the size and duration of these outbreaks enables maintenance of elimination to be monitored.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3