Top Document: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How come my cisco router doesn't accept an address like: "ip address 192.111.107.1 255.255.255.240" or "ip address 171.69.0.1 255.255.0.0" When "subnetting" of IP networks was first sanctioned by the IETF, the first and last subnets (the all zeros subnet and all ones subnet) were reserved for rather obscure uses and because of the confusion that would be caused with routing protocols that don't carry net mask information. It was technically illegal to place hosts or routers on those two subnets. Several hosts and most other vendor's router products have problems operating with the reserved subnets, so their use is discouraged. However, in 1995, the IETF removed the restrictions on the use of these reserved subnets as part of the classless routing effort. If you would like to use the reserved subnets, simply add the line "ip subnet-zero" to your cisco configuration. You might consider adding "ip subnet-zero" to all your configurations as a metter of course, to avoid being bitten by this in the future.User Contributions: Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc. |
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4